These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
238 related items for PubMed ID: 9927091
1. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems. Yoshiura K, Kawazu T, Chikui T, Tatsumi M, Tokumori K, Tanaka T, Kanda S. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity. Yoshiura K, Kawazu T, Chikui T, Tatsumi M, Tokumori K, Tanaka T, Kanda S. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test. Yoshiura K, Welander U, McDavid WD, Li G, Shi XQ, Nakayama E, Shimizu M, Okamura K, Kanda S. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film. Bóscolo FN, Oliveira AE, Almeida SM, Haiter CF, Haiter Neto F. Braz Dent J; 2001 Mar; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography. Yoshiura K, Stamatakis H, Shi XQ, Welander U, McDavid WD, Kristoffersen J, Tronje G. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9693524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs. Yoshiura K, Welander U, Shi XQ, Li G, Kawazu T, Tatsumi M, Okamura K, McDavid WD, Kanda S. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 11681484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms. Alpöz E, Soğur E, Baksi Akdeniz BG. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 18033946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction. Anissi HD, Geibel MA. Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparative study of analog and digital intraoral x-ray image detector systems]. Blendl C, Stengel C, Zdunczyk S. Rofo; 2000 Jun; 172(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 10916550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film. Mastoris M, Yoshiura K, Welander U, Tsiklakis K, Papadakis E, Li G. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is digital better in dental radiography? Zdesar U, Fortuna T, Valantic B, Skrk D. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 May; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]