These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

112 related items for PubMed ID: 9987446

  • 1. Performance of the AutoPap primary screening system at Jefferson University Hospital.
    Bibbo M, Hawthorne C.
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 9987446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Does use of the AutoPap assisted primary screener improve cytologic diagnosis?
    Bibbo M, Hawthorne C, Zimmerman B.
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9987445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
    Lee JS, Kuan L, Oh S, Patten FW, Wilbur DC.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
    Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW, Kaufman RH, Taylor DA.
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study.
    Patten SF, Lee JS, Wilbur DC, Bonfiglio TA, Colgan TJ, Richart RM, Cramer H, Moinuddin S.
    Cancer; 1997 Dec 25; 81(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 9438458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. AutoCyte Interactive Screening System. Experience at a university hospital cytology laboratory.
    Howell LP, Belk T, Agdigos R, Davis R, Lowe J.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 Dec 25; 43(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 9987451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sensitivity studies of AutoPap System Location-Guided Screening of cervical-vaginal cytologic smears.
    Huang TW, Lin TS, Lee JS.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 Dec 25; 43(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 10349363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A feasibility study of the use of the AutoPap screening system as a primary screening and location-guided rescreening device.
    Confortini M, Bonardi L, Bulgaresi P, Cariaggi MP, Cecchini S, Ciatto S, Cipparrone I, Galanti L, Maddau C, Matucci M, Rubeca T, Troni GM, Turco P, Zappa M, Carozzi F.
    Cancer; 2003 Jun 25; 99(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12811852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears.
    Rowe LR, Marshall CJ, Berry M, Larson MA, Bentz JS.
    Acta Cytol; 2003 Jun 25; 47(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 12920753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Impact of the AutoPap (currently Focalpoint) primary screening system location guide use on interpretation time and diagnosis.
    Ronco G, Vineis C, Montanari G, Orlassino R, Parisio F, Arnaud S, Berardengo E, Fabbrini T, Segnan N.
    Cancer; 2003 Apr 25; 99(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12704687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.