These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 9987447

  • 1. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece.
    Veneti S, Papaefthimiou M, Symiakaki H, Ioannidou-Mouzaka L.
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW, Kaufman RH, Taylor DA.
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
    Rosenthal DL, Acosta D, Peters RK.
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Does use of the AutoPap assisted primary screener improve cytologic diagnosis?
    Bibbo M, Hawthorne C, Zimmerman B.
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9987445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Negative cervical smears before CIN 3/carcinoma. Reevaluation with the PAPNET Testing System.
    Doornewaard H, van de Seijp H, Woudt JM, van der Graaf Y, van den Tweel JG.
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 9022729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System.
    Halford JA, Wright RG, Ditchmen EJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 9022730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. AutoCyte Interactive Screening System. Experience at a university hospital cytology laboratory.
    Howell LP, Belk T, Agdigos R, Davis R, Lowe J.
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 9987451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based preparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories.
    Vassilakos P, Saurel J, Rondez R.
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 9987452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer].
    Hølund B, Ejersbo D, Hjortebjerg A.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep 28; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prospective and randomised public-health trial on neural network-assisted screening for cervical cancer in Finland: results of the first year.
    Nieminen P, Hakama M, Viikki M, Tarkkanen J, Anttila A.
    Int J Cancer; 2003 Jan 20; 103(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 12471627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ, Tellado M, Buckner SB, Ali IS, Stevens A, Ollayos CW.
    JAMA; 1998 Jan 21; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears.
    Koss LG, Lin E, Schreiber K, Elgert P, Mango L.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb 21; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Quality control of cervical cytology in high-risk women. PAPNET system compared with manual rescreening.
    Bergeron C, Masseroli M, Ghezi A, Lemarie A, Mango L, Koss LG.
    Acta Cytol; 2000 Feb 21; 44(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 10740599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.
    Lancet; 1999 Apr 24; 353(9162):1381-5. PubMed ID: 10227217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Simulation of primary cervical cancer screening by the PAPNET system in an unscreened, high-risk community.
    Michelow PM, Hlongwane NF, Leiman G.
    Acta Cytol; 1997 Apr 24; 41(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 9022732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
    Mango LJ, Valente PT.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Apr 24; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Consistency of a double PAPNET scan of cervical smears.
    Jenny J, Isenegger I, Boon ME, Husain OA.
    Acta Cytol; 1997 Apr 24; 41(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 9022731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge.
    Solomon HM, Frist S.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Apr 24; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.