These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 9990210

  • 1. [Neuromuscular inhibitory effects of propofol evaluated by cat's evoked EMG].
    Suzuki T, Nagai H, Katsumata N, Ogawa S, Suzuki H.
    Masui; 1998 Dec; 47(12):1433-6. PubMed ID: 9990210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Investigations into neostigmine-induced inhibition of neuromuscular transmission].
    Kitajima O, Suzuki T, Fukano N, Miyake E, Saeki S, Ogawa S.
    Masui; 2009 Apr; 58(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19363999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [The effects of diltiazem on neuromuscular transmission].
    Suzuki T, Shiraishi H, Katsumata N, Saitoh H, Tai K, Ogawa S, Suzuki H.
    Masui; 1994 Jul; 43(7):1004-7. PubMed ID: 7933465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Study of neuromuscular transmission with evoked electromyography--11. Comparison between blocks by magnesium and by pancuronium].
    Shiraishi H, Katsumata N, Suzuki T, Ogawa S, Suzuki H.
    Masui; 1994 Apr; 43(4):538-46. PubMed ID: 8189619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Monitoring of neuromuscular transmission by electromyography during anaesthesia. A comparison with mechanomyography in cat and man.
    Engbaek J.
    Dan Med Bull; 1996 Sep; 43(4):301-16. PubMed ID: 8884132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. General anesthetic effects on compound muscle action potentials elicited by single or dual spinal cord stimulation.
    Yamada H, Transfeldt EE, Tamaki T, Nishiura H, Taylor BA, Torres F, Iaizzo PA.
    J Spinal Disord; 1995 Apr; 8(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 7606124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia.
    Yamamoto Y, Kawaguchi M, Hayashi H, Horiuchi T, Inoue S, Nakase H, Sakaki T, Furuya H.
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Mar; 106(3):930-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18292442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Comparative neuromuscular inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics].
    Suzuki T, Nagai H, Katsumata N, Ogawa S, Suzuki H.
    Masui; 1996 May; 45(5):599-607. PubMed ID: 8847787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Study of neuromuscular transmission with evoked electromyography--10. Comparison of the responses during partial blockade by bungarotoxin and non-depolarizing relaxants].
    Katsumata N, Shiraishi H, Itagaki T, Tai K, Suzuki H.
    Masui; 1990 Sep; 39(9):1178-87. PubMed ID: 1978865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Differential effect of propofol on sympathetic neurotransmission in isolated human omental arteries and veins.
    Wallerstedt SM, Bodelsson M.
    Br J Pharmacol; 1998 Sep; 125(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 9776351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.