These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

245 related items for PubMed ID: 999136

  • 21. [Correlation of the electrical and mechanical resonance frequencies of the cochlear hair cells of the auditory nerve fibers in the pigeon].
    Temchin AN.
    Neirofiziologiia; 1988; 20(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 3249607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Morphology of labeled afferent fibers in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Brown MC.
    J Comp Neurol; 1987 Jun 22; 260(4):591-604. PubMed ID: 3611412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Primary afferent and cochlear nucleus contributions to extracellular potentials during tone-bursts.
    Sellick P, Patuzzi R, Robertson D.
    Hear Res; 2003 Feb 22; 176(1-2):42-58. PubMed ID: 12583880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Click-evoked gross potentials and single-unit thresholds in acoustically traumatized cats.
    Pettigrew AM, Liberman MC, Kiang NY.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984 Feb 22; 112():83-96. PubMed ID: 6431888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
    Stronks HC, Versnel H, Prijs VF, Klis SF.
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan 22; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Effect of thiamine on auditory evoked potentials of the guinea pig].
    Romanenko AV, Chudnovskiĭ SI, Poliakov AN.
    Neirofiziologiia; 1986 Jan 22; 18(5):654-60. PubMed ID: 3022168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Different effects of noise and salicylate and their interactions on the guinea pig cochlea.
    Aoyagi M, Yoshida M, Makishima K.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1996 Jan 22; 253(7):429-34. PubMed ID: 8891489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. 2-Amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid receptors are not involved in synaptic transmission from hair cells to auditory neurons.
    Puel JL, Bobbin RP, Fallon M.
    Hear Res; 1988 Dec 22; 37(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 2852185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Effect of intracochlear electrical stimulation on action potential of auditory nerve in guinea pigs].
    Chen X.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Dec 22; 24(6):342-5, 384-5. PubMed ID: 2485460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Neural transduction in Xenopus laevis lateral line system.
    Strelioff D, Honrubia V.
    J Neurophysiol; 1978 Mar 22; 41(2):432-44. PubMed ID: 650276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Low-frequency neural and cochlear-microphonic tuning curves in the gerbil.
    Schmiedt RA, Zwislocki JJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Aug 22; 64(2):502-7. PubMed ID: 712012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The origin of the waveform of cochlear whole action potential.
    Boelen HJ.
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979 Aug 22; 222(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 444154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.
    Frijns JH, de Snoo SL, ten Kate JH.
    Hear Res; 1996 May 22; 95(1-2):33-48. PubMed ID: 8793506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The Davis theory: a review, and implications of recent electrophysiological evidence.
    Leng G.
    Hear Res; 1980 Jul 22; 3(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 7400045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Longitudinal comparisons of IHC ac and dc receptor potentials recorded from the guinea pig cochlea.
    Cheatham MA, Dallos P.
    Hear Res; 1993 Jun 22; 68(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 8376208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Membrane potential and response changes in mammalian cochlear hair cells during intracellular recording.
    Dallos P.
    J Neurosci; 1985 Jun 22; 5(6):1609-15. PubMed ID: 4009249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation.
    Suesserman MF, Spelman FA.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar 22; 40(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 8335327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.