60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18304119)
1. Aggregating disparate epidemiological evidence: comparing two seminal EMF reviews.
O'Carroll MJ; Henshaw DL
Risk Anal; 2008 Feb; 28(1):225-34. PubMed ID: 18304119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A meta-analysis of asbestos-related cancer risk that addresses fiber size and mineral type.
Berman DW; Crump KS
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():49-73. PubMed ID: 18686078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Childhood leukemia and residential magnetic fields: are pooled analyses more valid than the original studies?
Elwood JM
Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Feb; 27(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 16283664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of exposure metrics in an epidemiologic study on radio and television broadcast transmitters and the risk of childhood leukemia.
Schmiedel S; Brüggemeyer H; Philipp J; Wendler J; Merzenich H; Schüz J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Feb; 30(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 19025781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study.
Tricco AC; Tetzlaff J; Pham B; Brehaut J; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):380-386.e1. PubMed ID: 19128940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implications from epidemiologic studies on magnetic fields and the risk of childhood leukemia on protection guidelines.
Schüz J
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 17495667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated?
Colliver JA; Kucera K; Verhulst SJ
Med Educ; 2008 Sep; 42(9):858-65. PubMed ID: 18715482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses.
Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.
Ioannidis JP
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance alterations associated with occupational exposure to manganese--a meta-analysis.
Meyer-Baron M; Knapp G; Schäper M; van Thriel C
Neurotoxicology; 2009 Jul; 30(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 19465050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevention of childhood obesity - what type of evidence should we consider relevant?
Doak C; Heitmann BL; Summerbell C; Lissner L
Obes Rev; 2009 May; 10(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 19207878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
