BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20733453)

  • 1. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
    Barnett JC; Judd JP; Wu JM; Scales CD; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 116(3):685-693. PubMed ID: 20733453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
    Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
    Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
    Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost analysis of abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted myomectomies.
    Behera MA; Likes CE; Judd JP; Barnett JC; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 22100443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
    Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy.
    Shepherd JP; Kantartzis KL; Ahn KH; Bonidie MJ; Lee T
    JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital costs for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Reynisson P; Persson J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 130(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 23603368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy.
    Wright JD; Ananth CV; Tergas AI; Herzog TJ; Burke WM; Lewin SN; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 123(5):1038-1048. PubMed ID: 24785857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study of surplus cost of robotic assistance for radical hysterectomy, versus laparotomy and standard laparoscopy].
    Dennis T; de Mendonça C; Phalippou J; Collinet P; Boulanger L; Weingertner F; Leblanc E; Narducci F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Feb; 40(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 22252053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
    Holloway RW; Ahmad S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22136216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications.
    Marino P; Houvenaeghel G; Narducci F; Boyer-Chammard A; Ferron G; Uzan C; Bats AS; Mathevet P; Dessogne P; Guyon F; Rouanet P; Jaffre I; Carcopino X; Perez T; Lambaudie E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1102-8. PubMed ID: 26098092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.
    Tapper AM; Hannola M; Zeitlin R; Isojärvi J; Sintonen H; Ikonen TS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():1-10. PubMed ID: 24703710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
    Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective comparison of costs between robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in endometrial cancer among women with Class III obesity or higher.
    Kosa SD; Ferguson SE; Panzarella T; Lau S; Abitbol J; Samouëlian V; Giede C; Steed H; Renkosinski B; Gien LT; Bernardini MQ
    J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):747-753. PubMed ID: 34904716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
    Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
    Herling SF
    Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.