99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25299091)
1. Value of diffusion weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions at 3.0T MRI.
Jiang XY; Xie QZ; Cao XS; Gao T; Xing CY; Li XL
Genet Mol Res; 2014 Sep; 13(3):7773-9. PubMed ID: 25299091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions in diffusion-weighted MRI.
Şahin C; Arıbal E
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 24004972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value Measured Through Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Qu RF; Guo DR; Chang ZX; Meng J; Sun Y; Hao SH; Shi G; Sun J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 25783797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Kim SH; Cha ES; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jung JH; Park YG; Suh YJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):615-20. PubMed ID: 19711411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI.
Tan SL; Rahmat K; Rozalli FI; Mohd-Shah MN; Aziz YF; Yip CH; Vijayananthan A; Ng KH
Clin Radiol; 2014 Jan; 69(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24156797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Breast MRI: the usefulness of diffusion-weighted sequences for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions].
Barceló J; Vilanova JC; Albanell J; Ferrer J; Castañer F; Viejo N; Argelaguet M
Radiologia; 2009; 51(5):469-76. PubMed ID: 19647840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnostic value of ADC and rADC of diffusion weighted imaging in malignant breast lesions].
Xie CM; Yin SH; Li H; Liu XW; Zhang Y; Lü YC; Zhang R; Li JP; Geng ZJ; Wu PH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 32(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 20450592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Differentiation of axillary inflammatory and metastatic lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted imaging in animal modes].
Bai X; Liao Q; Wang JP; Bai RJ; Sun HR; Yu CS; Zhang YT
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 92(9):592-5. PubMed ID: 22800945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors.
Razek AA; Gaballa G; Denewer A; Nada N
NMR Biomed; 2010 Jul; 23(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 20232453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Luminal-type breast cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients with the Ki-67 labeling index.
Mori N; Ota H; Mugikura S; Takasawa C; Ishida T; Watanabe G; Tada H; Watanabe M; Takase K; Takahashi S
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 25203132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis?
Bogner W; Gruber S; Pinker K; Grabner G; Stadlbauer A; Weber M; Moser E; Helbich TH; Trattnig S
Radiology; 2009 Nov; 253(2):341-51. PubMed ID: 19703869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: a promising tool to differentiate metastatic from benign lymph nodes in animal models.
Xing W; Sheng J; Chen J; Tian JM; Bi HL
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Sep; 124(18):2907-10. PubMed ID: 22040501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T.
Lo GG; Ai V; Chan JK; Li KW; Cheung PS; Wong TT; Ma M; Lee R; Chien D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 19188787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesions.
Kul S; Eyuboglu I; Cansu A; Alhan E
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1158-64. PubMed ID: 24923252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the breast: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values of normal breast tissue with benign and malignant breast lesions.
Orguc S; Basara I; Coskun T
Singapore Med J; 2012 Nov; 53(11):737-43. PubMed ID: 23192501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer.
Park SO; Kim JK; Kim KA; Park BW; Kim N; Cho G; Choi HJ; Cho KS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 19161191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T.
Tsushima Y; Takahashi-Taketomi A; Endo K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 19629992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm(2)) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes.
Ochi M; Kuroiwa T; Sunami S; Murakami J; Miyahara S; Nagaie T; Oya M; Yabuuchi H; Hatakenaka M
Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 20(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 22161277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]