BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26704972)

  • 1. ChIP-BIT: Bayesian inference of target genes using a novel joint probabilistic model of ChIP-seq profiles.
    Chen X; Jung JG; Shajahan-Haq AN; Clarke R; Shih IeM; Wang Y; Magnani L; Wang TL; Xuan J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Apr; 44(7):e65. PubMed ID: 26704972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. iTAR: a web server for identifying target genes of transcription factors using ChIP-seq or ChIP-chip data.
    Yang CC; Andrews EH; Chen MH; Wang WY; Chen JJ; Gerstein M; Liu CC; Cheng C
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):632. PubMed ID: 27519564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Active promoters give rise to false positive 'Phantom Peaks' in ChIP-seq experiments.
    Jain D; Baldi S; Zabel A; Straub T; Becker PB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Aug; 43(14):6959-68. PubMed ID: 26117547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
    Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ChIP-Seq using high-throughput DNA sequencing for genome-wide identification of transcription factor binding sites.
    Lefrançois P; Zheng W; Snyder M
    Methods Enzymol; 2010; 470():77-104. PubMed ID: 20946807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic Inference on Multiple Normalized Genome-Wide Signal Profiles With Model Regularization.
    Wong KC; Peng C; Yan S; Liang C
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2017 Jan; 16(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 27893398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PICS: probabilistic inference for ChIP-seq.
    Zhang X; Robertson G; Krzywinski M; Ning K; Droit A; Jones S; Gottardo R
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):151-63. PubMed ID: 20528864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A MAD-Bayes Algorithm for State-Space Inference and Clustering with Application to Querying Large Collections of ChIP-Seq Data Sets.
    Zuo C; Chen K; Keleş S
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):472-485. PubMed ID: 27835030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ChIP-Seq: Library Preparation and Sequencing.
    Sheaffer KL; Schug J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1402():101-117. PubMed ID: 26721486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets.
    Chen L; Wang C; Qin ZS; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 25682068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is this the right normalization? A diagnostic tool for ChIP-seq normalization.
    Angelini C; Heller R; Volkinshtein R; Yekutieli D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():150. PubMed ID: 25957089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ChIP-GSM: Inferring active transcription factor modules to predict functional regulatory elements.
    Chen X; Neuwald AF; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009203. PubMed ID: 34292930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AIControl: replacing matched control experiments with machine learning improves ChIP-seq peak identification.
    Hiranuma N; Lundberg SM; Lee SI
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jun; 47(10):e58. PubMed ID: 30869146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ChIP-Seq Data Analysis to Define Transcriptional Regulatory Networks.
    Pavesi G
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2017; 160():1-14. PubMed ID: 28070596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An improved ChIP-seq peak detection system for simultaneously identifying post-translational modified transcription factors by combinatorial fusion, using SUMOylation as an example.
    Cheng CY; Chu CH; Hsu HW; Hsu FR; Tang CY; Wang WC; Kung HJ; Chang PC
    BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 24564277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using combined evidence from replicates to evaluate ChIP-seq peaks.
    Jalili V; Matteucci M; Masseroli M; Morelli MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2761-9. PubMed ID: 25957351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probabilistic Inference on Multiple Normalized Signal Profiles from Next Generation Sequencing: Transcription Factor Binding Sites.
    Wong KC; Peng C; Li Y
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(6):1416-28. PubMed ID: 26671811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.