154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27322701)
1. Cost-effectiveness of Management Options for Small Renal Mass: A Systematic Review.
Wang Y; Chen YW; Leow JJ; Levy AC; Chang SL; Gelpi FH
Am J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 39(5):484-90. PubMed ID: 27322701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nephron sparing options for the management of small renal masses.
Chang SL; Cipriano LE; Harshman LC; Garber AM; Chung BI
J Urol; 2011 May; 185(5):1591-7. PubMed ID: 21419445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses.
Castle SM; Gorbatiy V; Avallone MA; Eldefrawy A; Caulton DE; Leveillee RJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1327-32. PubMed ID: 22361086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contemporary management of small renal masses.
Volpe A; Cadeddu JA; Cestari A; Gill IS; Jewett MA; Joniau S; Kirkali Z; Marberger M; Patard JJ; Staehler M; Uzzo RG
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):501-15. PubMed ID: 21664040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contemporary management of small renal masses: does practice environment matter?
Smith PH; Elliott VL; Raman JD
Can J Urol; 2012 Oct; 19(5):6438-42. PubMed ID: 23040625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness, costs and trends in treatment of small renal masses from 2005 to 2007.
Kowalczyk KJ; Choueiri TK; Hevelone ND; Trinh QD; Lipsitz SR; Nguyen PL; Lynch JH; Hu JC
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E273-80. PubMed ID: 23452093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current Trends in Renal Surgery and Observation for Small Renal Masses.
Drangsholt S; Huang WC
Urol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 44(2):169-178. PubMed ID: 28411909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percutaneous cryoablation vs. open partial nephrectomy in small kidney cancers: the Italian experience.
Celia A; Pusceddu C; Silvestri T; Gidaro GB; Iannello F; Lanati EP; D'Ausilio A
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):178-186. PubMed ID: 32083414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The future of nephron sparing procedures for renal masses: balancing costs, efficacy, patient outcomes and experience.
Lotan Y
J Urol; 2011 May; 185(5):1560-1. PubMed ID: 21419436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost analysis of open, laparoscopic, and percutaneous treatment options for nephron-sparing surgery.
Link RE; Permpongkosol S; Gupta A; Jarrett TW; Solomon SB; Kavoussi LR
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):782-9. PubMed ID: 17094755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Case for Nephron Sparing Surgery in the Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.
Motamedinia P; Hoenig D; Okeke Z; Smith A
J Endourol; 2016 May; 30 Suppl 1():S18-22. PubMed ID: 26872591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Effectiveness of Surgical Treatments for Small Renal Masses.
Agrawal S; Sedlacek H; Kim SP
Urol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 44(2):257-267. PubMed ID: 28411917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Treatment of small renal masses: Effectiveness and cost-comparison analysis].
Piechaud-Kressmann J; Bellec L; Delchier-Bellec MC; Beauval JB; Roumiguié M; Gamé X; Soulie M; Rischmann P; Malavaud B
Prog Urol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 26718411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active Surveillance versus Immediate Intervention for Small Renal Masses: A Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Decision Analysis.
Su ZT; Patel HD; Huang MM; Alam R; Cheaib JG; Pavlovich CP; Allaf ME; Pierorazio PM
J Urol; 2022 Oct; 208(4):794-803. PubMed ID: 35686837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer.
Heuer R; Gill IS; Guazzoni G; Kirkali Z; Marberger M; Richie JP; de la Rosette JJ
Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 19853989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical and Minimally Invasive Therapies for the Management of the Small Renal Mass.
Withington J; Neves JB; Barod R
Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Aug; 18(8):61. PubMed ID: 28664237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of survival benefits of nephron-sparing intervention or active surveillance for patients with localized renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo RQ; Li XG
BMC Urol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):74. PubMed ID: 31382939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is laparoscopic partial nephrectomy already the gold standard for small renal masses?
Power NE; Silberstein JL; Touijer K
Arch Esp Urol; 2013; 66(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 23406804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active surveillance of small renal masses offers short-term oncological efficacy equivalent to radical and partial nephrectomy.
Patel N; Cranston D; Akhtar MZ; George C; Jones A; Leiblich A; Protheroe A; Sullivan M
BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(9):1270-5. PubMed ID: 22564495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Update on contemporary management of clinically localized renal cell carcinoma.
Jorns JJ; Thiel DD; Castle EP
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2012 Dec; 64(4):261-72. PubMed ID: 23288213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
