312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28118260)
1. Effect of different segmentation algorithms on metabolic tumor volume measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT of cervical primary squamous cell carcinoma.
Xu W; Yu S; Ma Y; Liu C; Xin J
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Mar; 38(3):259-265. PubMed ID: 28118260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal method for metabolic tumour volume assessment of cervical cancers with inter-observer agreement on [18F]-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography.
Arshad MA; Gitau S; Tam H; Park WE; Patel NH; Rockall A; Aboagye EO; Bharwani N; Barwick TD
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2009-2023. PubMed ID: 33313962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship of 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic, clinical and pathological characteristics of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Xu W; Yu S; Xin J; Guo Q
J Investig Med; 2016 Dec; 64(8):1246-1251. PubMed ID: 27436350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concordance of FDG PET/CT metabolic tumour volume versus DW-MRI functional tumour volume with T2-weighted anatomical tumour volume in cervical cancer.
Lai AYT; Perucho JAU; Xu X; Hui ES; Lee EYP
BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):825. PubMed ID: 29207964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardized uptake value and metabolic tumor volume measured by ¹⁸F FDG PET/CT are sensitive biomarkers for the presence of lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Vural GU; Akkas BE; Demirel BB
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 25018135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Volume-metabolic Combined Parameters from (18)F-FDG PET/CT May Help Predict the Outcomes of Cervical Carcinoma.
Sun Y; Lu P; Yu L
Acad Radiol; 2016 May; 23(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 26853968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of five segmentation tools for 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography-based target volume definition in head and neck cancer.
Schinagl DA; Vogel WV; Hoffmann AL; van Dalen JA; Oyen WJ; Kaanders JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Nov; 69(4):1282-9. PubMed ID: 17967318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy of pretreatment and after treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer.
Yilmaz B; Dağ S; Ergul N; Çermik TF
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Mar; 40(3):219-227. PubMed ID: 30585896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra-tumour 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity decreases the reliability on target volume definition with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.
Dong X; Wu P; Sun X; Li W; Wan H; Yu J; Xing L
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jun; 59(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25708154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PET/MRI-guided GTV delineation during radiotherapy planning in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.
Samołyk-Kogaczewska N; Sierko E; Zuzda K; Gugnacki P; Szumowski P; Mojsak M; Burzyńska-Śliwowska J; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Szczecina K; Jurgilewicz DH
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Sep; 195(9):780-791. PubMed ID: 31214735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Defining PET tumor volume in cervical cancer with hybrid PET/MRI: a comparative study.
Zhang S; Xin J; Guo Q; Ma J; Ma Q; Sun H; Zhao X
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Jul; 35(7):712-9. PubMed ID: 24709983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography-based gross tumor volume estimation and validation with magnetic resonance imaging for locally advanced cervical cancers.
Upasani MN; Mahantshetty UM; Rangarajan V; Purandare N; Merchant N; Thakur M; Engineer R; Chopra S; Shrivastava SK
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jul; 22(6):1031-6. PubMed ID: 22622949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic Value of Volume-Based Metabolic Parameters Obtained by 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma.
Liang Y; Li X; Wan H; Fang Y; Zheng R; Zhang W; Liu Y; Chen C; Wu N
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(3):429-434. PubMed ID: 29369948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 18F-FDG PET/CT of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Under Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Background-Based Adaptive-Volume Metrics Outperform TLG and MTV in Predicting Histopathologic Response.
Burger IA; Casanova R; Steiger S; Husmann L; Stolzmann P; Huellner MW; Curioni A; Hillinger S; Schmidtlein CR; Soltermann A
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 57(6):849-54. PubMed ID: 26823566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new method for segmentation of FDG PET metabolic tumour volume using the peritumoural halo layer and a 10-step colour scale. A study in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Jun S; Kim H; Nam HY
Nuklearmedizin; 2015; 54(6):272-85. PubMed ID: 26429587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in cervical cancer FDG uptake during chemoradiation and association with response.
Kidd EA; Thomas M; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F; Grigsby PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jan; 85(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 22520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre- and per-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters to predict recurrence and survival in cervical cancer.
Leseur J; Roman-Jimenez G; Devillers A; Ospina-Arango JD; Williaume D; Castelli J; Terve P; Lavoue V; Garin E; Lejeune F; Acosta O; De Crevoisier R
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):512-518. PubMed ID: 27569847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of preoperative intratumoral FDG uptake heterogeneity in early stage uterine cervical cancer.
Chung HH; Kang SY; Ha S; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Cheon GJ
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 27(2):e15. PubMed ID: 26768781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Time-Phase Effect on 18F-FDG PET/CT Delineation Methods for Treatment Planning of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Chen YZ; Li WF; Wang JY; Wang JM; Ou RY; Zheng XW; Xu YS; Zhao L
Clin Nucl Med; 2016 May; 41(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 26859212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
