BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28828583)

  • 1. Incorporation of Treatment Response, Tumor Grade and Receptor Status Improves Staging Quality in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Bergquist JR; Murphy BL; Storlie CB; Habermann EB; Boughey JC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 24(12):3510-3517. PubMed ID: 28828583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Neo-Bioscore Update for Staging Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Incorporation of Prognostic Biologic Factors Into Staging After Treatment.
    Mittendorf EA; Vila J; Tucker SL; Chavez-MacGregor M; Smith BD; Symmans WF; Sahin AA; Hortobagyi GN; Hunt KK
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jul; 2(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 26986538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the CPS+EG and Neo-Bioscore staging systems after preoperative systemic therapy for breast cancer in a single center in China.
    Xu L; Duan X; Zhou B; Liu Y; Ye J; Liu Z; Ma C; Zhang H; Zhang S; Zhang L; Zhao J; Cheng Y
    Breast; 2018 Aug; 40():29-37. PubMed ID: 29677568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the CPS + EG Staging System for Disease-Specific Survival in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Abdelsattar JM; Al-Hilli Z; Hoskin TL; Heins CN; Boughey JC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3206-11. PubMed ID: 27328945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Staging for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Utility of Incorporating Biologic Factors.
    Yi M; Lin H; Bedrosian I; Shen Y; Hunt KK; Chavez-MacGregor M; King TA; Mittendorf EA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 31667721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the performance of four staging systems in determining the prognosis of breast cancer among women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Soares ICS; Bello MA; Bergmann A; Thuler LCS
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jun; 187(2):547-555. PubMed ID: 33417086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Breast Cancer Staging Systems After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Kantor O; Laws A; Pastorello RG; King C; Wong S; Dey T; Schnitt S; King TA; Mittendorf EA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7347-7355. PubMed ID: 33956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic assessment of breast carcinoma submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pathological non-complete response.
    Resende U; Cabello C; Ramalho SOB; Zeferino LC
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):601. PubMed ID: 31208353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of CPS+EG, Neo-Bioscore, and modified Neo-Bioscore staging systems after preoperative systemic therapy of breast cancer: Protocol of a retrospective multicenter cohort study in China.
    Xu L; Zhang Z; Liu Q; Zhou B; Liu Y; Xiang Q; Zhu S; Duan X; Cui Y
    Thorac Cancer; 2018 Nov; 9(11):1565-1572. PubMed ID: 30296013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Evaluated by Residual Cancer Burden, Neoadjuvant Response Index, and Neo-Bioscore.
    Steenbruggen TG; van Seijen M; Janssen LM; van Ramshorst MS; van Werkhoven E; Vrancken Peeters MTDF; Wesseling J; Lips EH; Sonke GS
    Clin Cancer Res; 2019 Aug; 25(16):4985-4992. PubMed ID: 31076546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of the Neo-Bioscore Staging System in Guiding the Optimal Strategies for Regional Nodal Irradiation Following Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients with cN1 and ypN0-1.
    Cao L; Xu C; Kirova YM; Cai G; Cai R; Wang SB; Shen KW; Ou D; Chen JY
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):343-355. PubMed ID: 30519764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of CPS + EG, Neo-Bioscore and Modified Neo-Bioscore in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Preoperative Systemic Therapy: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
    Xu L; Liu Y; Fan Z; Jiang Z; Liu Y; Ling R; Zhang J; Yu Z; Jin F; Wang C; Cui S; Wang S; Mao D; Han B; Wang T; Zhang G; Wang T; Guo B; Yu L; Xu Y; Fu F; Liu Z; Wang S; Luo K; Xiang Q; Zhang Z; Liu Q; Zhou B; Liu Z; Ma C; Tong W; Mao J; Duan X; Cui Y
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():606477. PubMed ID: 33796452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External verification and improvement of the Neo-Bioscore staging system in a Chinese cohort.
    Geng R; Min N; Zheng Y; Hong C; Wu R; Wu H; Wei Y; Zhang Y; Li X
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jun; 10(11):626. PubMed ID: 35813331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Prognostic Value of the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
    Kantor O; Bao J; Jaskowiak N; Yao K; Tseng J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):352-358. PubMed ID: 31376037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on primary tumor reduction is correlated to survival in hormone receptor-positive but not hormone receptor-negative locally advanced breast cancer.
    Chen S; Liu Y; Ouyang QW; Huang L; Luo RC; Shao ZM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 25012266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes for Patients with Residual Stage II/III Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (AFT-01).
    Stankowski-Drengler TJ; Schumacher JR; Hanlon B; Livingston-Rosanoff D; Van de Walle K; Greenberg CC; Wilke LG; Neuman HB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 27(3):637-644. PubMed ID: 31900808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the AJCC 8th prognostic system for breast cancer in an Asian healthcare setting.
    Wong RX; Wong FY; Lim J; Lian WX; Yap YS
    Breast; 2018 Aug; 40():38-44. PubMed ID: 29677569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Mittendorf EA; Jeruss JS; Tucker SL; Kolli A; Newman LA; Gonzalez-Angulo AM; Buchholz TA; Sahin AA; Cormier JN; Buzdar AU; Hortobagyi GN; Hunt KK
    J Clin Oncol; 2011 May; 29(15):1956-62. PubMed ID: 21482989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of the CPS+EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Marmé F; Lederer B; Blohmer JU; Costa SD; Denkert C; Eidtmann H; Gerber B; Hanusch C; Hilfrich J; Huober J; Jackisch C; Kümmel S; Loibl S; Paepke S; Untch M; von Minckwitz G; Schneeweiss A
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Jan; 53():65-74. PubMed ID: 26693900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining Clinical and Pathologic Staging Variables Has Prognostic Value in Predicting Local-regional Recurrence Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
    Vila J; Teshome M; Tucker SL; Woodward WA; Chavez-MacGregor M; Hunt KK; Mittendorf EA
    Ann Surg; 2017 Mar; 265(3):574-580. PubMed ID: 27735826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.