189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29073719)
1. Value of whole breast magnetic resonance elastography added to MRI for lesion characterization.
Balleyguier C; Lakhdar AB; Dunant A; Mathieu MC; Delaloge S; Sinkus R
NMR Biomed; 2018 Jan; 31(1):. PubMed ID: 29073719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of MR elastography in addition to contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast-initial clinical results.
Siegmann KC; Xydeas T; Sinkus R; Kraemer B; Vogel U; Claussen CD
Eur Radiol; 2010 Feb; 20(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 19727753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What Help Could Ultrasound Elastography Give to the Diagnosis of Breast Papillary Lesions?
Li LJ; Yao JY; Zhou XC; Zhao XB; Zhong WJ; Ou B; Luo BM; Hao SY; Zhi H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):903-910. PubMed ID: 28256344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
Satake H; Nishio A; Ikeda M; Ishigaki S; Shimamoto K; Hirano M; Naganawa S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 21178068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for Evaluation of Ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System Category 4 Lesions.
Li XL; Xu HX; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Huang X; Li DD; Guo LH; Xu JM; Sun LP; Fang L; Xu XH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2050-7. PubMed ID: 27174418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI].
Siegmann KC; Moron HU; Baur A; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Bitzer M
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 19452398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Trop I; Chopier J; David J; Lalonde L; Darai E; Rouzier R; Uzan S
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 21771958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic values of breast imaging and reporting data system and ultrasonic elastography for benign and malignant breast lesions].
Yang M; Gu XN; Liu F; Wang YY; Cai YL; Liu DM; Zhou WJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 93(39):3125-7. PubMed ID: 24417992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can strain elastography combined with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system be a more effective method in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions?
Arslan S; Uslu N; Ozturk FU; Akcay EY; Tezcaner T; Agildere AM
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2017 Oct; 44(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 28154989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Ou B; Zhong WJ; Zhao ZZ; Zhao XB; Yang HY; Luo BM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3216-21. PubMed ID: 22608397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gail Model Improves the Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of Ultrasound BI-RADS for Predicting Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Gao LY; Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Luo BM; Zhou Q; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Guo JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S1-S7. PubMed ID: 33384211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions.
Park CS; Kim SH; Jung NY; Choi JJ; Kang BJ; Jung HS
Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 23584596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging in Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 4 Breast Lesions: A Prediction Model for Malignancy.
Li XL; Lu F; Zhu AQ; Du D; Zhang YF; Guo LH; Sun LP; Xu HX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3188-3199. PubMed ID: 32896449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
