148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30807546)
1. Value of Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Differentiating Malignant From Benign Breast Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bin L; Huihui Y; Weiping Y; Changyuan W; Qinghong Q; Weiyu M
Ultrasound Q; 2019 Mar; 35(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 30807546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of S-Detect for the differential diagnosis of breast masses on ultrasound: a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis.
Li J; Sang T; Yu WH; Jiang M; Hunag SY; Cao CL; Chen M; Cao YW; Cui XW; Dietrich CF
Med Ultrason; 2020 May; 22(2):211-219. PubMed ID: 32399528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound superb microvascular imaging for breast tumor: a meta-analysis.
Zhong L; Wang C
Med Ultrason; 2020 Sep; 22(3):313-318. PubMed ID: 32898204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Sound Touch Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Dong F; Wu H; Zhang L; Tian H; Liang W; Ye X; Liu Y; Xu J
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2181-2190. PubMed ID: 30593673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Meta-analysis.
Wu T; Feng JC; Tuerhong S; Wang B; Yang L; Zhao Q; Dilixiati J; Xu WT; Zhu LP
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Mar; 36(3):485-492. PubMed ID: 28133769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to conventional ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant solid breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wubulihasimu M; Maimaitusun M; Xu XL; Liu XD; Luo BM
Clin Radiol; 2018 Nov; 73(11):936-943. PubMed ID: 30297035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic Breast Volume Scanner versus Handheld Ultrasound in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Wang L; Qi ZH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1874-1881. PubMed ID: 31130410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D quantitative breast ultrasound analysis for differentiating fibroadenomas and carcinomas smaller than 1cm.
Meel-van den Abeelen AS; Weijers G; van Zelst JC; Thijssen JM; Mann RM; de Korte CL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():141-147. PubMed ID: 28189199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Power Doppler Ultrasound and a New Microvascular Doppler Ultrasound Technique (AngioPLUS) for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Jung HK; Park AY; Ko KH; Koh J
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Nov; 37(11):2689-2698. PubMed ID: 29528130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Pathologic Response Prediction in Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Zhou SC; Le J; Zhou J; Huang YX; Qian L; Chang C
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):e490-e509. PubMed ID: 32371140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differentiation of Breast Lesions: A Meta-analysis.
Ma X; Liu R; Zhu C; Zhang J; Ling W
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2095-102. PubMed ID: 27503752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Spick C; Baltzer PA
Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):401-9. PubMed ID: 25119022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.
Mutala TM; Ndaiga P; Aywak A
Cancer Imaging; 2016 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 27229478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang J; Zhao R; Cheng J
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 149():110219. PubMed ID: 35228171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3-Dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Added value of color patterns with emphasis on crater sign of coronal plane.
Chen YL; Chang C; Zeng W; Wang F; Chen JJ; Qu N
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Sep; 95(39):e4877. PubMed ID: 27684820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses in harmonic 3D power Doppler imaging.
Hsiao YH; Huang YL; Kuo SJ; Liang WM; Chen ST; Chen DR
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 18479868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
