142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31352128)
1. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: Clinical practice guidelines from the Italian society of colposcopy and cervical pathology (SICPCV).
Ciavattini A; Giannella L; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Sopracordevole F; Chiossi G; Di Giuseppe J;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():273-277. PubMed ID: 31352128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management and long-term outcomes of women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: A retrospective study.
Tan JHJ; Malloy MJ; Thangamani R; Gertig D; Drennan KT; Wrede CD; Saville M; Quinn M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 60(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 31578727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical significance of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in diagnosis and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma].
Song Y; Wang Q; Sui L; Gao SJ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):178-182. PubMed ID: 29609232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study.
Cohen PA; Brand A; Sykes P; Wrede DCH; McNally O; Eva L; Rao A; Campion M; Stockler M; Powell A; Codde J; Bulsara MK; Anderson L; Leung Y; Farrell L; Stoyles P
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017576. PubMed ID: 28851799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of cervical excisional dimensions on endocervical margins status in adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: A multicenter study from the FRANCOGYN group.
Bartin R; Delangle R; Mergui JL; Azaïs H; Bolze PA; Philip CA; Kerbage Y; Raimond E; Lecointre L; Carcopino X; Castela M; Uzan C; Canlorbe G
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 52(7):102622. PubMed ID: 37321399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical glandular neoplasia referrals and the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ: Correlating cytology, colposcopy findings, and clinical outcomes.
Nikolopoulos M; Athanasias P; Godfrey MAL; Nikolopoulos K; Maheshwari MK
Cytopathology; 2021 Nov; 32(6):751-757. PubMed ID: 34181788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is laser conization adequate for therapeutic excision of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix?
Akiba Y; Kubushiro K; Fukuchi T; Fujii T; Tsukazaki K; Mukai M; Nozawa S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Jun; 31(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 15916663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The status and distance of cone biopsy margins as a predictor of excision adequacy for endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Goldstein NS; Mani A
Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jun; 109(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 9620030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix be predicted before cervical conization?
Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Prompittayarat W; Kanjanavaha P; Peuwsai R; Dheerakul C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(4):522-4. PubMed ID: 17250421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
Hunter V; Tseng P
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive results of endocervical curettage as an indication for conization of the cervix.
Glazer JD; Benrubi GI; Nuss RC
South Med J; 1987 Feb; 80(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 3810213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women].
Cao QW; You ZX; Qian XY; Heng D; Tang MY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 31262123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ during pregnancy and subsequent fertility-sparing therapy challenge.
Sánchez-Cuerda C; Cuadra M; Gámir S; Lobo P; Elices M; Cabrera Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Jul; 158(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 34559882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.
Cohen PA; Leung Y; Anderson L; van der Griend R; Chivers P; Bilic S; Bittinger S; Brand A; Bulsara MK; Codde J; Eva L; Farrell L; Harker D; Herbst U; Jeffares S; Loh D; McNally O; Mohan GR; Nicholson T; Powell A; Salfinger SG; Simcock B; Stewart C; Silvers J; Stockler MR; Sykes P; Stoyles P; Tan A; Tan AL; Wrede CDH
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 33032824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conization as treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Ahlgren M; Ingemarsson I; Lindberg LG; Nordqvist RB
Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 1153146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fertility sparing treatment for in situ and early invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
McHale MT; Le TD; Burger RA; Gu M; Rutgers JL; Monk BJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 98(5 Pt 1):726-31. PubMed ID: 11704160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical implications.
Krebs HB; Wheelock JB; Hurt WG
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 3822303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
