152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35067067)
1. A Procedure for Eliciting Women's Preferences for Breast Cancer Screening Frequency.
Grayek E; Yang Y; Fischhoff B; Schifferdecker KE; Woloshin S; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL; Tosteson ANA
Med Decis Making; 2022 Aug; 42(6):783-794. PubMed ID: 35067067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Eliciting women’s preferences for breast cancer screening].
Sicsic J; Pelletier-Fleury N; Carretier J; Moumjid N
Sante Publique; 2019; S2(HS2):7-17. PubMed ID: 32372583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eliciting women's cervical screening preferences: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.
Wood B; Van Katwyk SR; El-Khatib Z; McFaul S; Taljaard M; Wright E; Graham ID; Little J
Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 5(1):136. PubMed ID: 27516072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision-making: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Carles M; Martínez-Alonso M; Pons A; Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Perestelo-Pérez L; Sala M; Vidal C; Garcia M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Codern N; Feijoo-Cid M; Romero A; Pla R; Soler-González J; Castells X; Rué M;
Trials; 2017 Sep; 18(1):426. PubMed ID: 28899412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services.
Mathioudakis AG; Salakari M; Pylkkanen L; Saz-Parkinson Z; Bramesfeld A; Deandrea S; Lerda D; Neamtiu L; Pardo-Hernandez H; Solà I; Alonso-Coello P
Psychooncology; 2019 May; 28(5):939-947. PubMed ID: 30812068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing Theory-Based Messages to Encourage Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer to Consider Biennial Mammography Screening.
Guan Y; Haardörfer R; McBride CM; Escoffery C; Lipscomb J
Ann Behav Med; 2023 Aug; 57(9):696-707. PubMed ID: 37155576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
Autier P; Boniol M
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level.
Onega T; Beaber EF; Sprague BL; Barlow WE; Haas JS; Tosteson AN; D Schnall M; Armstrong K; Schapira MM; Geller B; Weaver DL; Conant EF
Cancer; 2014 Oct; 120(19):2955-64. PubMed ID: 24830599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's Benefits and Harms Trade-Offs in Breast Cancer Screening: Results from a Discrete-Choice Experiment.
Sicsic J; Pelletier-Fleury N; Moumjid N
Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 29304944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cumulative 6-Year Risk of Screen-Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ by Screening Frequency.
Sprague BL; Chen S; Miglioretti DL; Gard CC; Tice JA; Hubbard RA; Aiello Bowles EJ; Kaufman PA; Kerlikowske K
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Feb; 6(2):e230166. PubMed ID: 36808238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Nelson HD; Tyne K; Naik A; Bougatsos C; Chan BK; Humphrey L;
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):727-37, W237-42. PubMed ID: 19920273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; Geller B; Dittus K; Braithwaite D; Wernli KJ; Miglioretti DL; O'Meara ES;
JAMA Intern Med; 2013 May; 173(9):807-16. PubMed ID: 23552817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?
Vass CM; Rigby D; Payne K
Value Health; 2018 Feb; 21(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29477404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantifying performance thresholds for recommending screening mammography: a revealed preference analysis of USPSTF guidelines.
Narayan AK; Elkin EB; Lehman CD; Morris EA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Nov; 172(2):463-468. PubMed ID: 30128821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Cancer Screening: Women's Attitudes and Beliefs in Light of Updated United States Preventive Services Task Force and American Cancer Society Guidelines.
Mehta JM; MacLaughlin KL; Millstine DM; Faubion SS; Wallace MR; Shah AA; Fields HE; Ruddy BE; Bryan MJ; Patel B; Temkit MH; Buras MR; Golafshar MA; Kling JM
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Mar; 28(3):302-313. PubMed ID: 30204537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Age, Race, and Socioeconomic Status on Women's Perceptions and Preferences Regarding Communication of Estimated Breast Cancer Risk.
Amornsiripanitch N; Ameri SM; Goldberg RJ
Acad Radiol; 2021 May; 28(5):655-663. PubMed ID: 32376184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
