342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35503557)
1. Metabolic tumor volume derived from
Ding C; Mao X; Li N; Huang M; Huang Z; Bao W; Li H; Fan J
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 35503557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters for risk stratification in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results from the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial.
Salavati A; Duan F; Snyder BS; Wei B; Houshmand S; Khiewvan B; Opanowski A; Simone CB; Siegel BA; Machtay M; Alavi A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Nov; 44(12):1969-1983. PubMed ID: 28689281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic utility of metabolic parameters on FDG PET/CT for lymph node metastasis in patients with cN2 non-small cell lung cancer.
Nakanishi K; Nakamura S; Sugiyama T; Kadomatsu Y; Ueno H; Goto M; Ozeki N; Fukui T; Iwano S; Chen-Yoshikawa TF
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):983. PubMed ID: 34474680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of prognostic values of primary tumor and nodal
Lim CH; Hyun SH; Moon SH; Cho YS; Choi JY; Lee KH
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5288-5297. PubMed ID: 30899978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Liao S; Penney BC; Wroblewski K; Zhang H; Simon CA; Kampalath R; Shih MC; Shimada N; Chen S; Salgia R; Appelbaum DE; Suzuki K; Chen CT; Pu Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jan; 39(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 21946983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Infante JR; Cabrera J; Rayo JI; Cruz C; Serrano J; Moreno M; Martínez A; Jiménez P; Cobo A
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2020; 39(6):353-359. PubMed ID: 32605894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of different
Anwar H; Vogl TJ; Abougabal MA; Grünwald F; Kleine P; Elrefaie S; Nour-Eldin NA
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 32(10):687-694. PubMed ID: 30219989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total lesion glycolysis by 18F-FDG PET/CT is independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Yıldırım F; Yurdakul AS; Özkaya S; Akdemir ÜÖ; Öztürk C
Clin Respir J; 2017 Sep; 11(5):602-611. PubMed ID: 26434685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of Volumetric Metabolic Parameters on Preoperative FDG PET/CT for Predicting Tumor Lymphovascular Invasion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Li C; Tian Y; Shen Y; Wen B; He Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1433-1443. PubMed ID: 33978465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic impact of the
Goksel S; Cengiz A; Ozturk H; Yurekli Y
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(4):925-930. PubMed ID: 34528543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volume-based parameters of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography improve outcome prediction in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection.
Hyun SH; Choi JY; Kim K; Kim J; Shim YM; Um SW; Kim H; Lee KH; Kim BT
Ann Surg; 2013 Feb; 257(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 22968069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume of pretreatment
Kumasaka S; Nakajima T; Arisaka Y; Tokue A; Achmad A; Fukushima Y; Shimizu K; Kaira K; Higuchi T; Tsushima Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2018 Nov; 18(1):46. PubMed ID: 30477476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of semi-quantitative FDG-PET parameters in stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Shrestha S; Higuchi T; Shirai K; Tokue A; Shrestha S; Saitoh JI; Hirasawa H; Ohno T; Nakano T; Tsushima Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 31758225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT metabolic parameters in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma].
Wu LL; Liang JH; Wang L; Xu W; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 41(11):831-836. PubMed ID: 31770850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Liu J; Dong M; Sun X; Li W; Xing L; Yu J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146195. PubMed ID: 26727114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on
Hui Z; Wei F; Ren H; Xu W; Ren X
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Oct; 146(10):2595-2605. PubMed ID: 32494919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of volumetric parameters measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer.
Kim K; Kim SJ; Kim IJ; Kim YS; Pak K; Kim H
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 22407127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic value of total tumour volume, adding necrosis to metabolic tumour volume, in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab.
Eude F; Guisier F; Salaün M; Thiberville L; Pressat-Laffouilhere T; Vera P; Decazes P
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Mar; 36(3):224-234. PubMed ID: 35060071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
