127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35536391)
1. Does the patient-assisted compression mode affect the mammography quality? A within-woman randomized controlled trial.
Perez-Leon D; Posso M; Louro J; Ejarque B; Arranz M; Arenas N; Maiques J; Martínez J; Maciá F; Román M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Castells X; Alcántara R
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7470-7479. PubMed ID: 35536391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of technical parameters and women's experience between self-compression and standard compression modes in mammography screening: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.
Arenas N; Alcantara R; Posso M; Louro J; Perez-Leon D; Ejarque B; Arranz M; Maiques J; Castells X; Macià F; Román M; Rodríguez-Arana A
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7480-7487. PubMed ID: 35536390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.
Balleyguier C; Cousin M; Dunant A; Attard M; Delaloge S; Arfi-Rouche J
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 103():137-142. PubMed ID: 30223227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Henrot P; Boisserie-Lacroix M; Boute V; Troufléau P; Boyer B; Lesanne G; Gillon V; Desandes E; Netter E; Saadate M; Tardivon A; Grentzinger C; Salleron J; Oldrini G
JAMA Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 179(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 30715083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the validity and reliability of two image classification systems for the assessment of mammogram quality.
Moreira C; Svoboda K; Poulos A; Taylor R; Page A; Rickard M
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 15814018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea.
Pape R; Spuur KM; Wilkinson JM; Zuhukepe A
J Med Radiat Sci; 2022 Mar; 69(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 34418330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Compression force and radiation dose in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Waade GG; Sanderud A; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():41-46. PubMed ID: 28189207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using automated software evaluation to improve the performance of breast radiographers in tomosynthesis screening.
Gennaro G; Povolo L; Del Genio S; Ciampani L; Fasoli C; Carlevaris P; Petrioli M; Masiero T; Maggetto F; Caumo F
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38019313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast compression parameters and mammographic density in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme.
Moshina N; Roman M; Waade GG; Sebuødegård S; Ursin G; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1662-1672. PubMed ID: 29098437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis?
Agasthya GA; D'Orsi E; Kim YJ; Handa P; Ho CP; D'Orsi CJ; Sechopoulos I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):W322-W332. PubMed ID: 28929809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography image quality and evidence based practice: Analysis of the demonstration of the inframammary angle in the digital setting.
Spuur K; Webb J; Poulos A; Nielsen S; Robinson W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Mar; 100():76-84. PubMed ID: 29496083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.
Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Toledano A; Paquelet JR; Bezzon E; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC
Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2087-94. PubMed ID: 23620367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital breast tomosynthesis in a population based mammographic screening program: Breast compression and early performance measures.
Moshina N; Larsen M; Holen ÅS; Waade GG; Aase HS; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 139():109665. PubMed ID: 33823373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast compression across consecutive examinations among females participating in BreastScreen Norway.
Waade GG; Sebuødegård S; Hogg P; Hofvind S
Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20180209. PubMed ID: 29927636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distribution of pressure on the breast in mammography using flexible and rigid compression plates: implications on patient handling.
Dustler M; Förnvik D; Timberg P; Zackrisson S; Muller S
Acta Radiol; 2021 Dec; 62(12):1583-1591. PubMed ID: 33280392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-centred care with self-compression mammography in clinical practice: a randomized trial compared to standard compression.
Iotti V; Giorgi Rossi P; Canovi L; Guberti M; Nitrosi A; Lippolis DG; Marchesi V; Besutti G; Ottone M; Vacondio R; Pattacini P;
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):450-460. PubMed ID: 35869315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
