120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35679699)
1. Effects of nonparticipation at previous screening rounds on the characteristics of screen-detected breast cancers.
Duijm LEM; Broeders MJM; Setz-Pels W; van Breest Smallenburg V; van Beek HC; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Slob MJ; Kuipers TP; Mann RM; Voogd AC
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110391. PubMed ID: 35679699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in surgery for screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a national screening programme.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Roumen RM; Jansen FH; Voogd AC
Br J Surg; 2014 Jul; 101(8):949-58. PubMed ID: 24828281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tumour characteristics of bilateral screen-detected cancers and bilateral interval cancers in women participating at biennial screening mammography.
van Bommel R; Lameijer JRC; Voogd AC; Nederend J; Louwman MWJ; Setz-Pels W; Strobbe LJ; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LE
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():215-221. PubMed ID: 30396659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-view versus single-view mammography at subsequent screening in a region of the Dutch breast screening programme.
van Breest Smallenburg V; Duijm LE; den Heeten GJ; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; Fracheboud J; Plaisier ML; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Broeders MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2189-94. PubMed ID: 21906898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; Louwman MW
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jan; 14(1):R10. PubMed ID: 22230363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Causes and consequences of delayed diagnosis in breast cancer screening with a focus on mammographic features and tumour characteristics.
van der Veer EL; Lameijer J; Coolen AMP; Bluekens AMJ; Nederend J; Gielens M; Voogd A; Duijm L
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Oct; 167():111048. PubMed ID: 37634439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography.
Weber RJ; van Bommel RM; Louwman MW; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 158(3):471-83. PubMed ID: 27393617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term trends in incidence, characteristics and prognosis of screen-detected and interval cancers in women participating in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme.
Ten Velde DE; Duijm LEM; van der Sangen MJC; Schipper RJ; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Vreuls W; Strobbe LJA; Voogd AC
Br J Cancer; 2024 May; 130(9):1561-1570. PubMed ID: 38467826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic changes resulting from benign breast surgery impair breast cancer detection at screening mammography.
van Breest Smallenburg V; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Louwman MW
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 48(14):2097-103. PubMed ID: 22513229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of screen-detected cancers following concordant or discordant recalls at blinded double reading in biennial digital screening mammography.
Coolen AMP; Lameijer JRC; Voogd AC; Louwman MWJ; Strobbe LJ; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):337-344. PubMed ID: 29943181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation.
Bernardi D; Gentilini MA; De Nisi M; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Luparia A; Houssami N
Breast; 2020 Apr; 50():135-140. PubMed ID: 31607526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening.
Caumo F; Romanucci G; Hunter K; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Macaskill P; Houssami N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29557996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency and diagnostic outcome of bilateral recall at screening mammography.
Lameijer JRC; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 32621785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Type and Extent of Surgery for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers at Blinded Versus Nonblinded Double-Reading in a Population-Based Screening Mammography Program.
Weber RJ; van Bommel RM; Setz-Pels W; Voogd AC; Klompenhouwer EG; Louwman MW; Strobbe LJ; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Nov; 23(12):3822-3830. PubMed ID: 27334217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early evaluation of an organised mammography screening program in Greece 2004-2009.
Simou E; Tsimitselis D; Tsopanlioti M; Anastasakis I; Papatheodorou D; Kourlaba G; Gerasimos P; Maniadakis N
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 35(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 21474412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in delayed breast cancer diagnosis after recall at screening mammography.
Lameijer JRC; Voogd AC; Broeders MJM; Pijnappel RM; Setz-Pels W; Strobbe LJ; Jansen FH; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 136():109517. PubMed ID: 33421886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening outcome in women repeatedly recalled for the same mammographic abnormality before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.
van Bommel R; Voogd AC; Louwman MW; Strobbe LJ; Venderink D; Duijm LE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 27180183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
