105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36724612)
1. Analysis of the relationship between global breast density and maximum points of breast density in a sample of Brazilian women.
Engler C; Nogueira MS
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Apr; 194():110703. PubMed ID: 36724612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local breast density assessment using reacquired mammographic images.
García E; Diaz O; Martí R; Diez Y; Gubern-Mérida A; Sentís M; Martí J; Oliver A
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():121-127. PubMed ID: 28668405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort.
Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Fieselmann A; Lång K; Sartor H
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):330-336. PubMed ID: 29943180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volumetric breast density measurement: sensitivity analysis of a relative physics approach.
Lau S; Ng KH; Abdul Aziz YF
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160258. PubMed ID: 27452264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic compression in Asian women.
Lau S; Abdul Aziz YF; Ng KH
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175781. PubMed ID: 28419125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic Density Distribution in Ras Al Khaimah (RAK): Relationships with Demographic and Reproductive Factors.
Albeshan SM; Hossain SZ; Mackey MG; Demchig D; Peat JK; Brennan PC
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Jun; 19(6):1607-1616. PubMed ID: 29936786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006.
Chen L; Ray S; Keller BM; Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 27002418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer.
Li J; Szekely L; Eriksson L; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):R114. PubMed ID: 22846386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme.
Ward L; Heller S; Hudson S; Wilkinson L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4717-4724. PubMed ID: 29808426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a phantom to test fully automated breast density software - A work in progress.
Waade GG; Hofvind S; Thompson JD; Highnam R; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):e14-e19. PubMed ID: 28290354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer.
Duffy SW; Morrish OWE; Allgood PC; Black R; Gillan MGC; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Maroni R; Lim YY; Purushothaman HN; Suaris T; Astley SM; Young KC; Tucker L; Gilbert FJ
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 88():48-56. PubMed ID: 29190506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative breast density analysis using tomosynthesis and comparison with MRI and digital mammography.
Moon WK; Chang JF; Lo CM; Chang JM; Lee SH; Shin SU; Huang CS; Chang RF
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Feb; 154():99-107. PubMed ID: 29249352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast tissue composition: a longitudinal mammographic study with automated volumetric measurement.
Jang HJ; Kim HJ; Chae YS; Lee SJ; Kim SH; Lee H; Kim WH
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4785-4794. PubMed ID: 32314056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts.
Rahbar K; Gubern-Merida A; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1561-1569. PubMed ID: 28754209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
