216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37535156)
1. Diagnostic performance of whole-body [
Mirshahvalad SA; Kohan A; Metser U; Hinzpeter R; Ortega C; Farag A; Veit-Haibach P
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):673-685. PubMed ID: 37535156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of [
Mirshahvalad SA; Hinzpeter R; Kohan A; Anconina R; Kulanthaivelu R; Ortega C; Metser U; Veit-Haibach P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Oct; 49(12):4205-4217. PubMed ID: 35705874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Brush J; Boyd K; Chappell F; Crawford F; Dozier M; Fenwick E; Glanville J; McIntosh H; Renehan A; Weller D; Dunlop M
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Sep; 15(35):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21958472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of Positron Emission Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Using Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose for the Diagnosis, Staging, and Recurrence Assessment of Bone Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Liu F; Zhang Q; Zhu D; Liu F; Li Z; Li J; Wang B; Zhou D; Dong J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Sep; 94(36):e1462. PubMed ID: 26356700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnostic accuracy of staging in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Huang X; Yang J; Li J; Xiong Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Aug; 99(35):e20932. PubMed ID: 32871859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Machado Medeiros T; Altmayer S; Watte G; Zanon M; Basso Dias A; Henz Concatto N; Hoefel Paes J; Mattiello R; de Souza Santos F; Mohammed TL; Verma N; Hochhegger B
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3641-3649. PubMed ID: 32125513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Staging/restaging performance of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A review and meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lin CL; Kao CH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():158-165. PubMed ID: 30292261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.
Wu Y; Li P; Zhang H; Shi Y; Wu H; Zhang J; Qian Y; Li C; Yang J
Int J Cancer; 2013 Jan; 132(2):E37-47. PubMed ID: 22890912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the diagnostic performance of 18-FDG-PET/MR compared to PET/CT for the N- and M- staging of breast cancer?
Botsikas D; Bagetakos I; Picarra M; Da Cunha Afonso Barisits AC; Boudabbous S; Montet X; Lam GT; Mainta I; Kalovidouri A; Becker M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1787-1798. PubMed ID: 30267154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speeding up PET/MR for cancer staging of children and young adults.
Aghighi M; Pisani LJ; Sun Z; Klenk C; Madnawat H; Fineman SL; Advani R; Von Eyben R; Owen D; Quon A; Moseley M; Daldrup-Link HE
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4239-4248. PubMed ID: 27048532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diagnostic performance of
Samim M; Molenaar IQ; Seesing MFJ; van Rossum PSN; van den Bosch MAAJ; Ruers TJM; Borel Rinkes IHM; van Hillegersberg R; Lam MGEH; Verkooijen HM
Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 28317583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis.
Zhang C; Liang Z; Liu W; Zeng X; Mo Y
BMC Cancer; 2023 Jan; 23(1):37. PubMed ID: 36624425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic role of F-18 FDG PET/CT for preoperative lymph node staging in thyroid cancer patients; A systematic review and metaanalysis.
Kim DH; Kim SJ
Clin Imaging; 2020 Sep; 65():100-107. PubMed ID: 32387798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A two-way comparison of whole-body 18FDG PET-CT and whole-body contrast-enhanced MRI for distant metastasis staging in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies.
Li J; Zhou H; Zhang X; Song F; Pang X; Wei Z
Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Mar; 9(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 32233618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Lamarca A; Barriuso J; Chander A; McNamara MG; Hubner RA; ÓReilly D; Manoharan P; Valle JW
J Hepatol; 2019 Jul; 71(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 30797051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of pre-treatment ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting metastasis in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han S; Woo S; Suh CH; Lee JJ
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 29(6):e98. PubMed ID: 30207106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
