127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37850378)
1. Quality of life after non-nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Nakai Y; Tanaka N; Inoue T; Onishi K; Morizawa Y; Hori S; Gotoh D; Miyake M; Torimoto K; Fujimoto K
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2024 Feb; 20(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 37850378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of life in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with those who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Nakai Y; Tanaka N; Asakawa I; Hori S; Miyake M; Yamaki K; Anai S; Torimoto K; Inoue T; Hasegawa M; Fujimoto K
Prostate; 2023 May; 83(7):701-712. PubMed ID: 36879383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support May Improve Urinary Continence and Quality of Life After Non-nerve-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Hikita K; Honda M; Shimizu R; Nishikawa R; Teraoka S; Kimura Y; Yamaguchi N; Iwamoto H; Morizane S; Takenaka A
In Vivo; 2023; 37(1):371-377. PubMed ID: 36593021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective evaluation of the improvement in the urinary status-related quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kohada Y; Hieda K; Miyamoto S; Tasaka R; Asami A; Akiyama K; Sakamoto Y; Kirishima F; Saito K; Fukushima T; Takemoto K; Babasaki T; Kobatake K; Kitano H; Goto K; Ikeda K; Hayashi T; Hinata N
Int J Urol; 2023 Nov; 30(11):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 37496371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pelvic Anatomical Features After Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Intended for Early Recovery of Urinary Symptoms.
Ota Y; Hamamoto S; Matsuyama N; Hamakawa T; Iwatsuki S; Etani T; Taguchi K; Naiki T; Ando R; Nakane A; Okada A; Kawai N; Kubota Y; Yasui T
J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 32935558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravesical prostatic protrusion may affect early postoperative continence undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hikita K; Honda M; Teraoka S; Nishikawa R; Kimura Y; Tsounapi P; Iwamoto H; Morizane S; Takenaka A
BMC Urol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):164. PubMed ID: 33087082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective assessment of time-dependent changes in quality of life of Japanese patients with prostate cancer following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Miyake H; Miyazaki A; Furukawa J; Hinata N; Fujisawa M
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 26885662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical use of expanded prostate cancer index composite-based health-related quality of life outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Fukuda K; Muto S; China T; Koyasu H; Noma Y; Ashizawa T; Hirano H; Kitamura K; Shimizu F; Nagata M; Isotani S; Horie S
Prostate Int; 2022 Mar; 10(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 35510095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinal, 5-year long-term outcomes for urinary continence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japanese patients.
Hikita K; Honda M; Shimizu R; Teraoka S; Kawamoto B; Yumioka T; Tsounapi P; Iwamoto H; Morizane S; Takenaka A
Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2022 May; 14(3):178-185. PubMed ID: 34856645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimal residual membranous urethral length and membranous urethral length predict poor recovery from incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and after open radical prostatectomy.
Ohara E; Kawamorita N; Satake Y; Kaiho Y; Mitsuzuka K; Saito H; Ishidoya S; Arai Y; Ito A
Int J Urol; 2022 Dec; 29(12):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 36094740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of life after brachytherapy or bilateral nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a prospective cohort.
Blanchard P; Davis JW; Frank SJ; Kim J; Pettaway CA; Pugh TJ; Pisters LL; Ward JF; Choi S; Chapin BF; Hoffman K; Navai N; Achim M; McGuire SE; Matin SF; Nguyen Q; Mahmood U; Graber WJ; Chen HC; Wang X; Kuban DA
BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):540-548. PubMed ID: 28941030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Herlemann A; Cowan JE; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 28499617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrity of the Urethral Sphincter Complex, Nerve-sparing, and Long-term Continence Status after Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Kim M; Park M; Pak S; Choi SK; Shim M; Song C; Ahn H
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):823-830. PubMed ID: 29759661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longitudinal evaluation of the frequency of sexual intercourse and sexual activity in patients after nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Inoue S; Hayashi T; Teishima J; Matsubara A
BJU Int; 2021 May; 127(5):560-566. PubMed ID: 33275823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact on quality of life of radical prostatectomy after initial active surveillance: more to lose?
van den Bergh RC; de Blok W; van Muilekom E; Tillier C; Venderbos LD; van der Poel HG
Scand J Urol; 2014 Aug; 48(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 24506062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.
Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) before and after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: does improvement of LUTS mitigate worsened incontinence after robotic prostatectomy?
Dommer L; Birzele JA; Ahmadi K; Rampa M; Stekhoven DJ; Strebel RT
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Aug; 8(4):320-328. PubMed ID: 31555555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
