120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38246806)
1. Clinical parameters for the prediction of occult lymph node metastasis in patients with negative PSMA-PET.
Huebner NA; Wasinger G; Rajwa P; Resch I; Korn S; Rasul S; Baltzer P; Prüger L; Rauschmeier A; Seitz C; Comperat E; Shariat SF; Grubmüller B
Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 42(4):115.e9-115.e16. PubMed ID: 38246806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2.
Ferraro DA; Muehlematter UJ; Garcia Schüler HI; Rupp NJ; Huellner M; Messerli M; Rüschoff JH; Ter Voert EEGW; Hermanns T; Burger IA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jan; 47(1):147-159. PubMed ID: 31522272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Establishment of New Thresholds for PLND-Validated Clinical Nomograms to Predict Non-Regional Lymph Node Metastases: Using
Jiao J; Quan Z; Zhang J; Wen W; Qin J; Yang L; Meng P; Jing Y; Ma S; Wu P; Han D; Davis AA; Ren J; Yang X; Kang F; Zhang Q; Wang J; Qin W
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():658669. PubMed ID: 33937073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distribution of prostate cancer recurrences on gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (
Huits TH; Luiting HB; van der Poel HG; Nandurkar R; Donswijk M; Schaake E; Vogel W; Roobol MJ; Wit E; Stricker P; Emmett L; van Leeuwen PJ
BJU Int; 2020 Jun; 125(6):876-883. PubMed ID: 32181951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT as a predictor of biochemical persistence and early recurrence following radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection.
Baas DJH; Schilham M; Hermsen R; de Baaij JMS; Vrijhof HJEJ; Hoekstra RJ; Sedelaar JPM; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Gotthardt M; Wijers CHW; van Basten JP; Somford DM
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Mar; 25(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 34471231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic accuracy of
Rajwa P; Heidenreich J; Drzezga A; Schmidt M; Shariat SF; Heidenreich A
Prostate; 2024 Jan; 84(1):74-78. PubMed ID: 37750292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial Experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.
Budäus L; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Steuber T; Rosenbaum C
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 26116958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of pelvic lymph node metastases and PSMA PET positive pelvic lymph nodes with multiparametric MRI and clinical information in primary staging of prostate cancer.
Hötker AM; Mühlematter U; Beintner-Skawran S; Ghafoor S; Burger I; Huellner M; Eberli D; Donati OF
Eur J Radiol Open; 2023; 10():100487. PubMed ID: 37065611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of
Zhang Q; Zang S; Zhang C; Fu Y; Lv X; Zhang Q; Deng Y; Zhang C; Luo R; Zhao X; Wang W; Wang F; Guo H
J Transl Med; 2017 Nov; 15(1):230. PubMed ID: 29115970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of the Optimal Candidates for Nodal Staging with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Prostate Cancer Patients Who Underwent Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography. External Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Briganti Nomograms and Development of a Novel Tool.
Gandaglia G; Barletta F; Robesti D; Scuderi S; Rajwa P; Gomez Rivas J; Ibanez L; Soeterik TFW; Bianchi L; Afferi L; Kesch C; Darr C; Guo H; Zhuang J; Zattoni F; Fendler W; Marra G; Stabile A; Amparore D; Huebner NA; Giesen A; Joniau S; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Mattei A; Dal Moro F; Sierra JM; Porpiglia F; Picchio M; van den Bergh R; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):543-552. PubMed ID: 37270378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Esen T; Falay O; Tarim K; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Kilic M; Seymen H; Sarikaya AF; Kiremit MC; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Baydar DE; Kordan Y; Demirkol MO; Tilki D
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 33509671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Combined with Sentinel Node Biopsy for Primary Lymph Node Staging in Prostate Cancer.
Hinsenveld FJ; Wit EMK; van Leeuwen PJ; Brouwer OR; Donswijk ML; Tillier CN; Vegt E; van Muilekom E; van Oosterom MN; van Leeuwen FWB; van der Poel HG
J Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 61(4):540-545. PubMed ID: 31562222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. External Validation and Addition of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography to the Most Frequently Used Nomograms for the Prediction of Pelvic Lymph-node Metastases: an International Multicenter Study.
Meijer D; van Leeuwen PJ; Roberts MJ; Siriwardana AR; Morton A; Yaxley JW; Samaratunga H; Emmett L; van de Ven PM; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Boellaard TN; Schoots IG; Oprea-Lager DE; Coughlin GD; Vis AN
Eur Urol; 2021 Aug; 80(2):234-242. PubMed ID: 34024652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (
van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk M; Nandurkar R; Stricker P; Ho B; Heijmink S; Wit EMK; Tillier C; van Muilenkom E; Nguyen Q; van der Poel HG; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 30074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
