184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38377605)
1. 3D modeling of normal skin and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. A comparative study in 2D cultures, spheroids, and 3D bioprinted systems.
Kurzyk A; Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A; Miłoszewska J; Chechlińska M
Biofabrication; 2024 Feb; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 38377605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D bioprinting complex models of cancer.
Sharma R; Restan Perez M; da Silva VA; Thomsen J; Bhardwaj L; Andrade TAM; Alhussan A; Willerth SM
Biomater Sci; 2023 May; 11(10):3414-3430. PubMed ID: 37000528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous 2D and 3D cell culture array for multicellular geometry, drug discovery and tumor microenvironment reconstruction.
Li S; Yang K; Chen X; Zhu X; Zhou H; Li P; Chen Y; Jiang Y; Li T; Qin X; Yang H; Wu C; Ji B; You F; Liu Y
Biofabrication; 2021 Aug; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 34407511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proof-of-concept: 3D bioprinting of pigmented human skin constructs.
Ng WL; Qi JTZ; Yeong WY; Naing MW
Biofabrication; 2018 Jan; 10(2):025005. PubMed ID: 29360631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Analysis of Dasatinib Effect between 2D and 3D Tumor Cell Cultures.
Sabetta S; Vecchiotti D; Clementi L; Di Vito Nolfi M; Zazzeroni F; Angelucci A
Pharmaceutics; 2023 Jan; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 36839692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laser-based 3D bioprinting for spatial and size control of tumor spheroids and embryoid bodies.
Kingsley DM; Roberge CL; Rudkouskaya A; Faulkner DE; Barroso M; Intes X; Corr DT
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():357-370. PubMed ID: 30776506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioprintable Alginate/Gelatin Hydrogel 3D In Vitro Model Systems Induce Cell Spheroid Formation.
Jiang T; Munguia-Lopez J; Flores-Torres S; Grant J; Vijayakumar S; De Leon-Rodriguez A; Kinsella JM
J Vis Exp; 2018 Jul; (137):. PubMed ID: 30010644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D Printed Solutions for Spheroid Engineering and Cancer Research.
Butelmann T; Gu Y; Li A; Tribukait-Riemenschneider F; Hoffmann J; Molazem A; Jaeger E; Pellegrini D; Forget A; Shastri VP
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(15):. PubMed ID: 35897762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Non-small cell lung cancer 95D cells co-cultured with 3D-bioprinted scaffold to construct a lung cancer model in vitro].
Mou H; Wang J; Hu H; Xu W; Chen Q
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 37(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 26813591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional lung tumor microenvironment modulates therapeutic compound responsiveness in vitro--implication for drug development.
Ekert JE; Johnson K; Strake B; Pardinas J; Jarantow S; Perkinson R; Colter DC
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92248. PubMed ID: 24638075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D Bioprinted Vascularized Tumour for Drug Testing.
Han S; Kim S; Chen Z; Shin HK; Lee SY; Moon HE; Paek SH; Park S
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 32340319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Cancer Modeling and Personalized Medicine.
Germain N; Dhayer M; Dekiouk S; Marchetti P
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Mar; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 35408789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mimicking tumor microenvironment by 3D bioprinting: 3D cancer modeling.
Shukla P; Yeleswarapu S; Heinrich MA; Prakash J; Pati F
Biofabrication; 2022 May; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35512666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioprinted Skin Recapitulates Normal Collagen Remodeling in Full-Thickness Wounds.
Jorgensen AM; Varkey M; Gorkun A; Clouse C; Xu L; Chou Z; Murphy SV; Molnar J; Lee SJ; Yoo JJ; Soker S; Atala A
Tissue Eng Part A; 2020 May; 26(9-10):512-526. PubMed ID: 31861970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recent advances in microarray 3D bioprinting for high-throughput spheroid and tissue culture and analysis.
Shrestha S; Lekkala VKR; Acharya P; Siddhpura D; Lee MY
Essays Biochem; 2021 Aug; 65(3):481-489. PubMed ID: 34296737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advantages and limitations of using cell viability assays for 3D bioprinted constructs.
Avnet S; Pompo GD; Borciani G; Fischetti T; Graziani G; Baldini N
Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 38306683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ECM concentration and cell-mediated traction forces play a role in vascular network assembly in 3D bioprinted tissue.
Zhang G; Varkey M; Wang Z; Xie B; Hou R; Atala A
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2020 Apr; 117(4):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 31840798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of culture conditions on the bone regeneration potential of osteoblast-laden 3D bioprinted constructs.
Raveendran N; Ivanovski S; Vaquette C
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():190-201. PubMed ID: 36155098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real-time viability and apoptosis kinetic detection method of 3D multicellular tumor spheroids using the Celigo Image Cytometer.
Kessel S; Cribbes S; Bonasu S; Rice W; Qiu J; Chan LL
Cytometry A; 2017 Sep; 91(9):883-892. PubMed ID: 28618188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strategies for 3D bioprinting of spheroids: A comprehensive review.
Banerjee D; Singh YP; Datta P; Ozbolat V; O'Donnell A; Yeo M; Ozbolat IT
Biomaterials; 2022 Dec; 291():121881. PubMed ID: 36335718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
