BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

25 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38554354)

  • 1. Minimally invasive esophagectomy with non-invasive ventilation by laryngeal mask-assisted anesthesia for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: case report.
    Che W; Zhong J; Huang J; Chen H; Feng C; Xie Y; He H; Chen Y; Li C; Wu B; Ding W; Lin W
    Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1344662. PubMed ID: 38800373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Chao YK; Hsieh MJ; Liu YH; Liu HP
    World J Surg; 2018 Feb; 42(2):590-598. PubMed ID: 28801820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transition from video-assisted thoracoscopic to robotic esophagectomy: a single surgeon's experience.
    Chao YK; Wen YW; Chuang WY; Cerfolio RJ
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Mar; 33(2):. PubMed ID: 31022725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Yüksel S; Topal U; Songür MZ; Çalıkoğlu İ; Karaköse E; Ercan E; Teke Z; Bektaş H
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2024 Jan; 20(1):410-416. PubMed ID: 38554354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.
    Perry R; Barbosa JP; Perry I; Barbosa J
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):125. PubMed ID: 38492067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic versus open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate.
    Weindelmayer J; De Pasqual CA; Turolo C; Gervasi MC; Sacco M; Bencivenga M; Giacopuzzi S
    J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1109-1115. PubMed ID: 36971002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy: Current Situation and Future Perspectives.
    Watanabe M; Kuriyama K; Terayama M; Okamura A; Kanamori J; Imamura Y
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 29(4):168-176. PubMed ID: 37225478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
    Rebecchi F; Ugliono E; Allaix ME; Morino M
    Updates Surg; 2023 Feb; 75(2):367-372. PubMed ID: 35953621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.