BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38568095)

  • 1. Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time.
    Park EK; Kwak S; Lee W; Choi JS; Kooi T; Kim EK
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230318. PubMed ID: 38568095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists.
    Kim JG; Haslam B; Diab AR; Sakhare A; Grisot G; Lee H; Holt J; Lee CI; Lotter W; Sorensen AG
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230137. PubMed ID: 38323914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Pinto MC; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Pedersen K; Hofvind S; Wicklein J; Kappler S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):529-536. PubMed ID: 34227882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
    van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic Surveillance After Breast-Conserving Therapy: Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection.
    Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Moon HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jan; 218(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 34378399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of real-life use of artificial intelligence as support for human reading in a population-based breast cancer screening program with mammography and tomosynthesis.
    Elías-Cabot E; Romero-Martín S; Raya-Povedano JL; Brehl AK; Álvarez-Benito M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3958-3966. PubMed ID: 37975920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Shoshan Y; Bakalo R; Gilboa-Solomon F; Ratner V; Barkan E; Ozery-Flato M; Amit M; Khapun D; Ambinder EB; Oluyemi ET; Panigrahi B; DiCarlo PA; Rosen-Zvi M; Mullen LA
    Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 35040677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons between artificial intelligence computer-aided detection synthesized mammograms and digital mammograms when used alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in a virtual screening setting.
    Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
    Jpn J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 36068450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standalone AI for Breast Cancer Detection at Screening Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Yoon JH; Strand F; Baltzer PAT; Conant EF; Gilbert FJ; Lehman CD; Morris EA; Mullen LA; Nishikawa RM; Sharma N; Vejborg I; Moy L; Mann RM
    Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e222639. PubMed ID: 37219445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artificial intelligence computer-aided detection enhances synthesized mammograms: comparison with original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in an experimental setting.
    Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
    Breast Cancer; 2023 Jan; 30(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 36001270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent Computer-Aided Detection Improves Reading Time of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Maintains Interpretation Performance in a Multireader Multicase Study.
    Benedikt RA; Boatsman JE; Swann CA; Kirkpatrick AD; Toledano AY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):685-694. PubMed ID: 29064756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.
    Schaffter T; Buist DSM; Lee CI; Nikulin Y; Ribli D; Guan Y; Lotter W; Jie Z; Du H; Wang S; Feng J; Feng M; Kim HE; Albiol F; Albiol A; Morrell S; Wojna Z; Ahsen ME; Asif U; Jimeno Yepes A; Yohanandan S; Rabinovici-Cohen S; Yi D; Hoff B; Yu T; Chaibub Neto E; Rubin DL; Lindholm P; Margolies LR; McBride RB; Rothstein JH; Sieh W; Ben-Ari R; Harrer S; Trister A; Friend S; Norman T; Sahiner B; Strand F; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; ; Mackey L; Cahoon J; Shen L; Sohn JH; Trivedi H; Shen Y; Buturovic L; Pereira JC; Cardoso JS; Castro E; Kalleberg KT; Pelka O; Nedjar I; Geras KJ; Nensa F; Goan E; Koitka S; Caballero L; Cox DD; Krishnaswamy P; Pandey G; Friedrich CM; Perrin D; Fookes C; Shi B; Cardoso Negrie G; Kawczynski M; Cho K; Khoo CS; Lo JY; Sorensen AG; Jung H
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e200265. PubMed ID: 32119094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).
    Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Levy L; Toubiana PR; Cohen-Scali F; Toledano AY; Boyer B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():83-89. PubMed ID: 29153373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving Accuracy and Efficiency with Concurrent Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Conant EF; Toledano AY; Periaswamy S; Fotin SV; Go J; Boatsman JE; Hoffmeister JW
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2019 Jul; 1(4):e180096. PubMed ID: 32076660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.
    Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
    Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.