119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38702557)
1. Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer following suspicious mpMRI: analyses from a high-volume center.
Jahnen M; Hausler T; Meissner VH; Ankerst DP; Kattan MW; Sauter A; Gschwend JE; Herkommer K
World J Urol; 2024 May; 42(1):290. PubMed ID: 38702557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factor analysis and optimal cutoff value selection of PSAD for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with negative mpMRI: results from a high-volume center in Southeast China.
Lin S; Jiang W; Ding J; Hao S; Chen H; Xie L; Zheng X
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 22(1):140. PubMed ID: 38802859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elucidating the need for prostate cancer risk calculators in conjunction with mpMRI in initial risk assessment before prostate biopsy at a tertiary prostate cancer center.
Krausewitz P; Büttner T; von Danwitz M; Weiten R; Cox A; Klümper N; Stein J; Luetkens J; Kristiansen G; Ritter M; Ellinger J
BMC Urol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):71. PubMed ID: 38532370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do all patients with suspicious prostate cancer need Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging before prostate biopsy?
Teixeira Anacleto S; Neves Alberto J; Carvalho Dias E; Sousa Passos P; Cerqueira Alves M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Mar; 94(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 35352522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences.
Haack M; Miksch V; Tian Z; Duwe G; Thomas A; Borkowetz A; Stroh K; Thomas C; Haferkamp A; Höfner T; Boehm K
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2947-2954. PubMed ID: 36318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
Panebianco V; Barchetti G; Simone G; Del Monte M; Ciardi A; Grompone MD; Campa R; Indino EL; Barchetti F; Sciarra A; Leonardo C; Gallucci M; Catalano C
Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 29566957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS
BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability of mpMRI diagnostic performance according to the upfront individual patient risk of having clinically significant prostate cancer.
Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Sorce G; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Quarta L; Leni R; Robesti D; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Prostate; 2024 Apr; 84(5):473-478. PubMed ID: 38149793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.
Wagaskar VG; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Young J; Lantz A; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1357. PubMed ID: 33661541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective assessment of two-gene urinary test with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate for men undergoing primary prostate biopsy.
Busetto GM; Del Giudice F; Maggi M; De Marco F; Porreca A; Sperduti I; Magliocca FM; Salciccia S; Chung BI; De Berardinis E; Sciarra A
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1869-1877. PubMed ID: 32681273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for prostate cancer in men with false-negative mpMRI: A retrospective single center cohort study of image quality scores and clinical parameters.
Pausch AM; Ghafoor S; Kluckert J; Rupp NJ; Eberli D; Hötker AM
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jan; 170():111227. PubMed ID: 38039782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
