67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38703000)
1. Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chang JHE; Xu H; Zhao Y; Wee IJY; Ang JX; Tan EK; Seow-En I
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Jun; 409(1):172. PubMed ID: 38829526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment.
Houqiong J; Ziwen W; Chonghan Z; Penghui H; Hongxin Y; Weijie L; Dongning L; Taiyuan L
Front Surg; 2023; 10():1092128. PubMed ID: 36874472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The natural orifice specimen extraction surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of efficacy and long-term oncological outcomes.
Wang S; Tang J; Sun W; Yao H; Li Z
Int J Surg; 2022 Jan; 97():106196. PubMed ID: 34922029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection.
Muhammad S; Jiang Z; Fan T; Tang Q; Hai Y; Ehsan SBE; Bilal M; Zubayraeva AA; Gao Y; He J
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 May; 7(5):e2003. PubMed ID: 38703000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
Xu S; Zhang H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study.
Li Z; Xiong H; Qiao T; Jiao S; Zhu Y; Wang G; Wang X; Tang Q
BMC Surg; 2022 Jul; 22(1):286. PubMed ID: 35879754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study.
Zhang H; Hu H; Huang R; Guan Z; Zheng M; Xu C; Li Z; Wang Y; Zhang W; Yu L; Jin Y; Tang Q; Wang G; Wang X
Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):599-607. PubMed ID: 34370279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.
Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Lin XH; Hu JH
Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():102-108. PubMed ID: 31362128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anterior Resections for Cancer with Natural Orifice Versus Conventional Specimen Extraction: A Case-Control Study.
Chang SC; Chen HC; Chen YC; Ke TW; Tsai YY; Wang HM; Fingerhut A; Chen WT
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Aug; 63(8):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 32692072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colon cancer treatment: a double-center case-matched study of surgical and short-term postoperative outcomes.
Tsarkov P; Liu Z; Zubayraeva A; Marchuk A; Korolev G; Liu E; Wang X; Efetov S
Chin Med J (Engl); 2023 May; 136(10):1234-1236. PubMed ID: 37057722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction, a minimally invasive surgical technique for mid-rectal cancers: Retrospective single-center analysis and single-surgeon experience of selected patients.
Muhammad S; Gao Y; Guan X; QingChao T; Fei S; Wang G; Chen Y; Liu Z; Jiang Z; Kaur K; Tatiana K; Ul Ain Q; Wang X; He J
J Int Med Res; 2022 Nov; 50(11):3000605221134472. PubMed ID: 36440806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is natural orifice specimen extraction surgery the future direction of minimally invasive colorectal surgery?
Zhang M; Liu Z; Wang X
Surg Open Sci; 2022 Oct; 10():106-110. PubMed ID: 36111268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short- and long-term outcomes as well as anal function of transanal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer resection: a retrospective study with over 5-year follow-up.
Zhang J; Li W; Li Y; Amin B; Zhang N; Sun Z; Zhu B
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2022 Jun; 17(2):344-351. PubMed ID: 35707343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic versus open lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: multicentre retrospective cohort study.
Lim HK; Kim M; Park JW; Ryoo SB; Park KJ; Oh HK; Kim DW; Kang SB; Lee DW; Park SC; Oh JH; Jeong SY;
BJS Open; 2022 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35694967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cancer statistics, 2022.
Siegel RL; Miller KD; Fuchs HE; Jemal A
CA Cancer J Clin; 2022 Jan; 72(1):7-33. PubMed ID: 35020204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
