144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38711135)
1. Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [
Ayati N; McIntosh L; Buteau J; Alipour R; Pudis M; Daw N; Jackson P; Hofman MS
Cancer Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38711135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes of [
Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.
Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ordered subset expectation maximisation vs Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.
Witkowska-Patena E; Budzyńska A; Giżewska A; Dziuk M; Walęcka-Mazur A
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 34(3):192-199. PubMed ID: 31902120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared With Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights.
Chilcott AK; Bradley KM; McGowan DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 29091008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Various β Values on Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements in 68Ga-RM2 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Images Reconstructed With a Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm.
Baratto L; Duan H; Ferri V; Khalighi M; Iagaru A
Clin Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 45(7):506-513. PubMed ID: 32433170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-treatment
Eisazadeh R; Mirshahvalad SA; Schwieghofer-Zwink G; Hehenwarter L; Rendl G; Gampenrieder S; Greil R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2024 Apr; 26(2):360-369. PubMed ID: 38360991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of New Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on Visualization and Quantification of Upper Abdominal Malignant Tumors in Clinical FDG PET/CT Examinations.
Tatsumi M; Soeda F; Kamiya T; Ueda J; Katayama D; Matsunaga K; Watabe T; Kato H; Tomiyama N
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():707023. PubMed ID: 34485143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction on the image quality of
Yang FJ; Ai SY; Wu R; Lv Y; Xie HF; Dong Y; Meng QL; Wang F
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20201356. PubMed ID: 33571001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction impact on quantitative metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Young JR; Mugu VK; Johnson GB; Ehman EC; Packard AT; Homb AC; Nathan MA; Thanarajasingam G; Kemp BJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32665. PubMed ID: 36820562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regularized reconstruction of digital time-of-flight
Lindström E; Velikyan I; Regula N; Alhuseinalkhudhur A; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
Theranostics; 2019; 9(12):3476-3484. PubMed ID: 31281491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for
Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR
J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) of
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Schuster DM; Tsakok MT; Gleeson FV; Bradley KM
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20170727. PubMed ID: 29303359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The variation of quantitative parameters and Deauville scores with different reconstruction algorithms in FDG PET/CT imaging of lymphoma patients.
Genc M; Yildirim N; Coskun N; Ozdemir E; Turkolmez S
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2023; 42(6):388-392. PubMed ID: 37524200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
