105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38717459)
1. Active surveillance of low-grade prostate cancer using the SurACaP Criteria: A multi-institutional series with a median follow-up of 10years.
Leclercq L; Bastide C; Lechevallier E; Walz J; Charvet AL; Gondran-Tellier B; Campagna J; Savoie PH; Long-Depaquit T; Daniel L; Rossi D; Pignot G; Baboudjian M
Fr J Urol; 2024 Mar; 34(2):102571. PubMed ID: 38717459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort.
Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Epstein JI; Landis P; Macura KJ; Simopoulos DN; Carter HB; Gorin MA
Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):675-682. PubMed ID: 31918957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A single-center long-term experience of active surveillance for prostate cancer: 15 years of follow-up.
Song SH; Kim JK; Lee H; Lee S; Hong SK; Byun SS
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 33258324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy.
Willemse PM; Davis NF; Grivas N; Zattoni F; Lardas M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; De Santis M; Dell'Oglio P; Donaldson JF; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Gillessen S; Grummet JP; Henry AM; Liew M; MacLennan S; Mason MD; Moris L; Plass K; O'Hanlon S; Omar MI; Oprea-Lager DE; Pang KH; Paterson CC; Ploussard G; Rouvière O; Schoots IG; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; Van den Broeck T; van der Kwast TH; van der Poel HG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TBL
Eur Urol; 2022 Apr; 81(4):337-346. PubMed ID: 34980492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oncological Outcomes in Men With Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Enrolled in Active Surveillance.
Pepe P; Pepe L; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F
In Vivo; 2024; 38(3):1300-1305. PubMed ID: 38688647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.
Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; Rannikko A; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Kakehi Y; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):814-21. PubMed ID: 26138043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
Panebianco V; Barchetti G; Simone G; Del Monte M; Ciardi A; Grompone MD; Campa R; Indino EL; Barchetti F; Sciarra A; Leonardo C; Gallucci M; Catalano C
Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 29566957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Active surveillance in males with low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer: A modern prospective cohort study.
Rakauskas A; Tawadros T; Lucca I; Herrera F; Bourhis J; Burruni R; Gomes MN; Codeluppi C; Jolliet L; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Jichlinski P; Berthold D; Valerio M
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Jul; 62(4):416-422. PubMed ID: 34190436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Maggi M; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Sciarra A; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33157570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging before Confirmatory Biopsy in Assessing the Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression during Active Surveillance.
Salguero J; Gómez-Gómez E; Valero-Rosa J; Carrasco-Valiente J; Mesa J; Martin C; Campos-Hernández JP; Rubio JM; López D; Requena MJ
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 22(4):559-567. PubMed ID: 33289358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance in active surveillance of a low-risk prostate cancer cohort from clinical practice.
Chamorro Castillo L; García Morales L; Ruiz López D; Salguero Segura J; Valero Rosa J; Anglada Curado FJ; Mesa Quesada J; Blanca Pedregosa A; Carrasco Valiente J; Gómez Gómez E
Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):765-772. PubMed ID: 36895160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Strict Protocol Adherence Remains Important for PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):483-489. PubMed ID: 31411970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confirmatory biopsy of men under active surveillance: extended versus saturation versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Pepe P; Cimino S; Garufi A; Priolo G; Russo GI; Giardina R; Reale G; Pennisi M; Morgia G
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):260-263. PubMed ID: 28513296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative first follow-up prostate biopsy on active surveillance is associated with decreased risk of upgrading, suspicion of progression and converting to active treatment.
Singh S; Sandhu P; Beckmann K; Santaolalla A; Dewan K; Clovis S; Rusere J; Zisengwe G; Challacombe B; Brown C; Cathcart P; Popert R; Dasgupta P; Van Hemelrijck M; Elhage O
BJU Int; 2021 Jul; 128(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 33098158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Progression and treatment rates using an active surveillance protocol incorporating image-guided baseline biopsies and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring for men with favourable-risk prostate cancer.
Thurtle D; Barrett T; Thankappan-Nair V; Koo B; Warren A; Kastner C; Saeb-Parsy K; Kimberley-Duffell J; Gnanapragasam VJ
BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 29438586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
