137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38725003)
1. Association between pathologic complete response and biochemical indicators after neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer.
Chen W; Zhang J; Li F; Chen Z; Li J; Lu DL
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 22(1):126. PubMed ID: 38725003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does Tumor Size Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Modern Era of Biologically Driven Treatment? A Nationwide Study of US Breast Cancer Patients.
Livingston-Rosanoff D; Schumacher J; Vande Walle K; Stankowski-Drengler T; Greenberg CC; Neuman H; Wilke LG
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(6):e741-e747. PubMed ID: 31300338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How? : IHC Profile and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
De La Cruz LM; Harhay MO; Zhang P; Ugras S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3535-3540. PubMed ID: 29981025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative digital imaging analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry predicts the response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast carcinoma.
Li AC; Zhao J; Zhao C; Ma Z; Hartage R; Zhang Y; Li X; Parwani AV
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Apr; 180(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 32002765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-world data on breast pathologic complete response and disease-free survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study in China.
Guan D; Jie Q; Wu Y; Xu Y; Hong W; Meng X
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 20(1):326. PubMed ID: 36175898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of
Lee IH; Lee SJ; Lee J; Jung JH; Park HY; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Chae YS
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1106. PubMed ID: 33198673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrepancies Between Pathological Tumor Responses and Estimations of Complete Response by Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Differ by Breast Cancer Subtype.
Namura M; Tsunoda H; Yagata H; Hayashi N; Yoshida A; Morishita E; Takei J; Suzuki K; Yamauchi H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(2):128-134. PubMed ID: 28843513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the 12-Gene Molecular Score and the 21-Gene Recurrence Score as Predictors of Response to Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
Soliman H; Wagner S; Flake DD; Robson M; Schwartzberg L; Sharma P; Magliocco A; Kronenwett R; Lancaster JM; Lanchbury JS; Gutin A; Gradishar W
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 27(3):765-771. PubMed ID: 31907749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expression of ER, PgR, HER-2, and Ki-67 in core biopsies and in definitive histological specimens in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Rossi L; Verrico M; Tomao S; Ricci F; Fontana A; Spinelli GP; Colonna M; Vici P; Tomao F
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2020 Jan; 85(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31754747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Serum Tumor Marker Levels might have Little Significance in Evaluating Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
Wang YJ; Huang XY; Mo M; Li JW; Jia XQ; Shao ZM; Shen ZZ; Wu J; Liu GY
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(11):4603-8. PubMed ID: 26107211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locoregional Control According to Breast Cancer Subtype and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast-conserving Therapy.
Swisher SK; Vila J; Tucker SL; Bedrosian I; Shaitelman SF; Litton JK; Smith BD; Caudle AS; Kuerer HM; Mittendorf EA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):749-56. PubMed ID: 26511263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Turkish patients.
Duman BB; Afşar ÇU; Günaldi M; Sahin B; Kara IO; Erkisi M; Erçolak V
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(8):4119-23. PubMed ID: 23098527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Second-look Ultrasonography in Predicting Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer Patients.
Hayashi N; Tsunoda H; Namura M; Ochi T; Suzuki K; Yamauchi H; Nakamura S
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 30206035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of immunohistochemistry in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an old tool with an enduring prognostic value.
Sánchez-Muñoz A; Plata-Fernández YM; Fernández M; Jaén-Morago A; Fernández-Navarro M; de la Torre-Cabrera C; Ramirez-Tortosa C; Lomas-Garrido M; Llácer C; Navarro-Perez V; Alba-Conejo E; Sánchez-Rovira P
Clin Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 13(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 23318089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Relevance to Tumor Subtypes and MRI Interpretation Threshold.
Kim Y; Sim SH; Park B; Lee KS; Chae IH; Park IH; Kwon Y; Jung SY; Lee S; Ko K; Kang HS; Lee CW; Lee ES
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(6):459-467.e1. PubMed ID: 29954674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FOXA1 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a prognostic marker in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Kawase M; Toyama T; Takahashi S; Sato S; Yoshimoto N; Endo Y; Asano T; Kobayashi S; Fujii Y; Yamashita H
Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):308-16. PubMed ID: 23771556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of breast cancer subtypes on the response to anthracycline neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients.
Stamatovic L; Susnjar S; Gavrilovic D; Minic I; Ursulovic T; Dzodic R
J BUON; 2018; 23(5):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 30570847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment for operable breast cancer. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 017.
De Los Santos JF; Cantor A; Amos KD; Forero A; Golshan M; Horton JK; Hudis CA; Hylton NM; McGuire K; Meric-Bernstam F; Meszoely IM; Nanda R; Hwang ES
Cancer; 2013 May; 119(10):1776-83. PubMed ID: 23436342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. De-escalated therapy for HR+/HER2+ breast cancer patients with Ki67 response after 2-week letrozole: results of the PerELISA neoadjuvant study.
Guarneri V; Dieci MV; Bisagni G; Frassoldati A; Bianchi GV; De Salvo GL; Orvieto E; Urso L; Pascual T; Paré L; Galván P; Ambroggi M; Giorgi CA; Moretti G; Griguolo G; Vicini R; Prat A; Conte PF
Ann Oncol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):921-926. PubMed ID: 30778520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Prognostic Effect of Changes in Tumor Stage and Nodal Status After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Each Primary Breast Cancer Subtype.
Hayashi N; Takahashi Y; Matsuda N; Tsunoda H; Yoshida A; Suzuki K; Nakamura S; Yamauchi H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(2):e219-e229. PubMed ID: 29138067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
