48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8298861)
1. Clinical diagnosis from digital displays: results and conclusions from the St Mary's evaluation project.
Dawood RM; Craig JO; Todd-Pokrapek A; Porter AW; Highman JH; Cunningham DA; Stevens JM; al-Kutoubi A; Crofton ME
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):1-10. PubMed ID: 8298861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical diagnosis from digital displays: preliminary findings of the St Mary's Evaluation Project.
Dawood RM; Craig JO; Highman JH; Wadsworth J; Glass HI; Todd-Pokropek A; Cunningham DA; Stevens JM; Al-Kutoubi A; Kerslake RW
Clin Radiol; 1989 Jul; 40(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 2758744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subperiosteal resorption: effect of full-frame image compression of hand radiographs on diagnostic accuracy.
Sayre JW; Ho BK; Boechat MI; Hall TR; Huang HK
Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):599-603. PubMed ID: 1410380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The detectability of osteoarticular lesions of the extremities on the television monitor].
Salvini E; Zincone G; Macchi I; Mariani AM; Crespi A; Paruccini N
Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):401-4. PubMed ID: 8190921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption.
Murphey MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Mar; 152(3):541-6. PubMed ID: 2783807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of digital mammography in needle localization procedures.
Dershaw DD; Fleischman RC; Liberman L; Deutch B; Abramson AF; Hann L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):559-62. PubMed ID: 8352104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography.
Vyborny CJ; Giger ML
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 8109525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital mammography is very useful in mass screening of breast cancer].
Nab HW; Karssemeijer N; van Erning LJ; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Dec; 134(49):2383-7. PubMed ID: 2263263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast imaging: a comparison of digital luminescence radiographs displayed on TV-monitor and film-screen mammography.
Jarlman O; Borg A; Braw M; Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Samuelsson L
Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 7812984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided diagnosis: detection and characterization of hyperparathyroidism in digital hand radiographs.
Chang CL; Chan HP; Niklason LT; Cobby M; Crabbe J; Adler RS
Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):983-92. PubMed ID: 8413042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image data compression in magnification hand radiographs.
Bramble JM; Cook LT; Murphey MD; Martin NL; Anderson WH; Hensley KS
Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):133-6. PubMed ID: 2909086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [3-dimensional (3-D) image reconstruction of the facial skull and skull base in computerized tomography].
Grodd W; Dannenmaier B; Petersen D; Gehrke G
Radiologe; 1987 Nov; 27(11):502-10. PubMed ID: 3423258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed vs. film-screen magnification radiography of fingers in hyperparathyroidism. An ROC analysis.
Jónsson A; Hannesson P; Herrlin K; Jonsson K; Andersen R; Pettersson H
Acta Radiol; 1995 May; 36(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 7742125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Computer-assisted visualization of digital mammography images].
Funke M; Netsch T; Breiter N; Biehl M; Peitgen HO; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1999 Nov; 171(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 10619037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.
Kegelmeyer WP; Pruneda JM; Bourland PD; Hillis A; Riggs MW; Nipper ML
Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 8153302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
